Re: ppp/peers/* files

2007-06-24 Thread Artyom Viklenko
Jim Stapleton wrote: I can't find a way to specify mppe-128 for either pptp or pppd in the man files, and every doc I see (including the man pages examples, which don't work when I specify it in the file) seem to suggest that I use either "mppe-128" or "require-mppe-128" for pppd, neither of whic

Re: how do you bring IPv6 live without reboot?

2007-06-24 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
George Michaelson wrote: its interesting that when I sent-pr'd this, I got tut-tutted back to freebsd questions. In my books, not being able to do this kind of V6 maintenance work on the interface without taking it down probably deserves to be kept as an open bug! I agree. Please mail me the

Building a kernel with SCTP support

2007-06-24 Thread Vlad GALU
Hi list, I have SCTP, SCTP_DEBUG and SCTP_HIGH_SPEED defined in my kernel configuration file. However, it looks that the SCTP source files aren't even built, so the linking fails with -- cut here -- linking kernel.debug uipc_syscalls.o(.text+0x31a): In function `sctp_generic_recvmsg': ../../../

Re: Building a kernel with SCTP support

2007-06-24 Thread Kip Macy
Do I need to define additional flags in my config file? No, unless sctp_pcb.c was somehow removed from your sys/conf/files you probably need to 'make cleandepend; make depend'. It builds fine for me with those options. -Kip ___ freebsd-net@freebs

Re: Building a kernel with SCTP support

2007-06-24 Thread Vlad GALU
On 6/24/07, Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Do I need to define additional flags in my config file? No, unless sctp_pcb.c was somehow removed from your sys/conf/files you probably need to 'make cleandepend; make depend'. It builds fine for me with those options. I did that, and t

Re: Building a kernel with SCTP support

2007-06-24 Thread Vlad GALU
On 6/25/07, Yann Berthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, at 21:31, Vlad GALU wrote: >Hi list, I have SCTP, SCTP_DEBUG and SCTP_HIGH_SPEED defined in my > kernel configuration file. However, it looks that the SCTP source > files aren't even built, so the linking fails with

Re: Building a kernel with SCTP support

2007-06-24 Thread Yann Berthier
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, at 21:31, Vlad GALU wrote: >Hi list, I have SCTP, SCTP_DEBUG and SCTP_HIGH_SPEED defined in my > kernel configuration file. However, it looks that the SCTP source > files aren't even built, so the linking fails with try including INET6 and see if it helps - when i tr

Re: Building a kernel with SCTP support

2007-06-24 Thread Kip Macy
Interesting - Randall - does SCTP depend on ipv6? Or did you mean to have a pipe between inet and inet6? netinet/sctp_asconf.c optional inet inet6 sctp netinet/sctp_auth.c optional inet inet6 sctp netinet/sctp_bsd_addr.c optional inet inet6 sctp netinet/sctp_crc32.

Re: Building a kernel with SCTP support

2007-06-24 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 02:31:45PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote: > Interesting - > > Randall - does SCTP depend on ipv6? Or did you mean to have a pipe > between inet and inet6? > > >From /sys/conf/NOTES: # # Note YOU MUST have both INET and INET6 defined. # you don't have to enable V6, but SCTP is

Re: kern/113842: enabling IPv6 post-boot didn't work: required reboot

2007-06-24 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Synopsis: enabling IPv6 post-boot didn't work: required reboot Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: bms Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jun 24 22:37:28 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Real issue. I may get around to this but am currently allocated on non

Re: watchdog timeout problem with freebsd 6.2-stable and v6.4.1 if_em driver

2007-06-24 Thread Andrew Snow
Jack Vogel wrote: After medium-heavy traffic, the NIC locks up completely and no traffic passes for a long time, perhaps longer than half an hour. Then, it recovers and prints this to syslog: em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting em0: link state changed to DOWN em0: link state changed to UP If yo

Questions about PF_KEY interface

2007-06-24 Thread blue
Dear all: I found there are two directories about PF_KEY interface: netkey and netipsec under $FreeBSD src$\sys\. Looking into the makefile, the one that is currently used and built in is netkey. However, I am wondering what's the purpose for netipsec? Besides, the handling for the global