On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:19:15AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
> According to the following thread, one must do more then just apply the NAT-T
> patch and rebuild the kernel:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011855.html
>
> What other steps are necessary to
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Yvan,
> rebuilding/reinstalling world may be very interesting as some system
> programs uses some structs which size are changed by the patch.
Is there any hope to see NATT support, based on your patches, included
in -current before 7.0-RELEASE en
Julian Elischer wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Does any driver do this now? And if a driver were to coalesce
packets and send something up the stack that violates mss
will it barf?
It would barf for things like bridging where the pack
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 5/29/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/27/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/27/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Jack,
> >
> > Jack Vogel wrote:
> > > Stefan,
> > >
> > > I am having a long weekend and am supposed to be
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:38:26AM +0200, Eric Masson wrote:
> VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Yvan,
Hi Eric,
> > rebuilding/reinstalling world may be very interesting as some system
> > programs uses some structs which size are changed by the patch.
>
> Is there any hope t
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> There is always some hope :-)
:)
> I know that some FreeBSD developpers have expressed some interest in
> this patch, I had some discussions with some of them since some months
> ago, but actually, I can just wait for a commit or for some
> fee
On Thu, 31 May 2007, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:38:26AM +0200, Eric Masson wrote:
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Yvan,
Hi Eric,
rebuilding/reinstalling world may be very interesting as some system
programs uses some structs which size are changed b
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:52:03AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
[...]
>
> Maybe you could start addressing the things I posted last September?
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011807.html
You're right: I was sure that t
I wish this would happen too. I'm using NAT-T in combination with a cisco
client I use for work and home. It works great!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Eric Masson
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:38 AM
To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
Cc: freebsd-net@
Hugo Koji Kobayashi wrote:
Hello,
While making some tests with fragmented udp DNS responses (with
EDNS0), we discovered a possible problem with ipf and pf in FreeBSD
6.2 and 7.0 (200705 snapshot).
Our test is a DNS query to an DNSSEC enabled server which replies with
a ~4KB udp response. We do
0n Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Does any driver do this now? And if a driver were to coalesce
> packets and send something up the stack that violates mss
> will it barf?
erm, what is meant by "coalesce" ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the prop
Hello,
Recently, I have leased a rack in Asianetcom and some bandwidth.
However, the speed for my curcuit is substantially slower than my
provider's company site. The provider said my circuit and their one are
treated exactly the same way.
Below is the URL for the download:
My circuit*: http
On Thu, 31 May 2007 22:06:39 +0800, Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently, I have leased a rack in Asianetcom and some bandwidth.
> However, the speed for my curcuit is substantially slower than my
> provider's company site.
> [...]
> *This server is using FreeBSD 6.2 patch 4 with Apache in
>On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:52:03AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 May 2007, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
>[...]
>>
>> Maybe you could start addressing the things I posted last September?
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011807.html
>
>You're right: I was sur
On 5/31/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you very much for the help Jack :))
Unfortunately I'm off next four days and probably will not be able to
test it before Monday.
Btw any chances to have patch for releng_6 or the difference in the
drivers is too big ? :)
Welcome, turn
On 5/31/07, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Andrew Thompson wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>>> Does any driver do this now? And if a driver were to coalesce
>>> packets and send something up the stack that violates mss
>>>
On 5/31/07, Wilkinson, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
0n Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Does any driver do this now? And if a driver were to coalesce
> packets and send something up the stack that violates mss
> will it barf?
erm, what is meant by "c
Thanks for reply.
Nicolas Gieczewski wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 22:06:39 +0800, Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Recently, I have leased a rack in Asianetcom and some bandwidth.
However, the speed for my curcuit is substantially slower than my
provider's company site.
[...]
*This server is
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 5/31/07, Wilkinson, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
0n Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Does any driver do this now? And if a driver were to coalesce
> packets and send something up the stack that violates mss
> will it barf?
erm,
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:51:35PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I wanted to let everyone know that I will soon have a
> new 10G driver to add to the tree. It is a PCI Express
> MSI/X adapter, I would like to call this driver 'ix' rather
> than follow Linux who are calling it 'ixgbe'. It is not
> back
Bruce -
All LRO implementations are currently on the host.
On 5/31/07, Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 5/31/07, Wilkinson, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 0n Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>>
>> > Does any driver do this no
He stated previously that they are not compatible.
On 5/31/07, Christian Brueffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:51:35PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I wanted to let everyone know that I will soon have a
> new 10G driver to add to the tree. It is a PCI Express
> MSI/X adapte
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:52:03AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
[]
> Maybe you could start addressing the things I posted last September?
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011807.html
I just integrated the patch.
To be able to identify future versions of the pa
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:37:30AM +, Matthew Grooms wrote:
[]
> >The rest of the patch is ok and will be included today.
> >
>
> Does that mean that only a single issue mentioned by Bjoern has not been
> addressed in the latest version of the patch set?
I integrated Bjoern's patch to my
On 5/30/07, Alexander Motin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ermal Luçi wrote:
> OK, here it is with stats activated :).
One more: all binary netgraph messages are hidden from user-level in
ng_pf.h. They are all covered with #ifdef _KERNEL. Specially?
No special need just forgotten by me.
I fixed t
On 5/31/07, Christian Brueffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:51:35PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I wanted to let everyone know that I will soon have a
> new 10G driver to add to the tree. It is a PCI Express
> MSI/X adapter, I would like to call this driver 'ix' rather
> th
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:34:11 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.meijome.net/files/freebsd/test_hk_dl/fbsd_NL_test_from_au.cap
> the same file, which I uploaded to a FBSD in NL (as mentioned above). Ping
> time
> is about 320 ms to this box from home. Probably as fast as
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:21:13 +0800
Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for reply.
>
> Nicolas Gieczewski wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 May 2007 22:06:39 +0800, Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Recently, I have leased a rack in Asianetcom and some bandwidth.
> >> However, the speed for m
28 matches
Mail list logo
