Hello everybody,
I just managed to lock my box and I want to report it
in case it's known(or it helps in some way). It is a
6.2-STABLE from March 13. The procedure that triggers
the lock is simple:
1) Create a pptp tunnel.
2) Set is as your default gateway.
3) Play a bit with the netmask of the
Yes, Linux is tested on big endian, however FreeBSD testing
is limited. I would expect the shared code to be ok but the
core code is tested on little endian only. Do you have some
notion of where the problem is? I'm pretty busy with another
issue right at the moment.
Jack
On 5/21/07, Kip Macy <
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Judge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:01 AM
> To: Sastry Tumuluri
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Detecting LINK_UP / LINK_DOWN events
>
> Sastry Tumuluri wrote:
> > Friends,
> >
> > I am trying to catch and do so
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 12:19, Sastry Tumuluri wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tom Judge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:01 AM
> > To: Sastry Tumuluri
> > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Detecting LINK_UP / LINK_DOWN events
> >
> > Sastry Tum
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikos Vassiliadis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:58 PM
> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 12:19, Sastry Tumuluri wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tom Judge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:01 A
Hello, colleagues,
what do you think about cleaning the routing table on mask change?
I think it should be done. Currently we are cleaning the routing
table only on SIOCDIFADDR operation, because it removes prefix from
an interface. However, SIOCAIFADDR also may delete (actually replace)
a pre
On 5/22/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, Linux is tested on big endian, however FreeBSD testing
is limited. I would expect the shared code to be ok but the
core code is tested on little endian only. Do you have some
notion of where the problem is? I'm pretty busy with another
issue
> what do you think about cleaning the routing table on mask change?
I think it would be far easier and more correct to not allow
just the mask change (which is never really needed).
$ ifconfig tap0 10.1.1.0/24
$ netstat -nr | grep tap0
10.1.1.0/24link#6 UC 0
On 5/22/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/22/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, Linux is tested on big endian, however FreeBSD testing
> is limited. I would expect the shared code to be ok but the
> core code is tested on little endian only. Do you have some
> notion of
The following reply was made to PR kern/112654; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nagy Keve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/112654: [pcn] Kernel panic upon if_pcn module load on a
Netfinity 5000
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:39:03
Hello;
Almost a year ago a port of DragonFly's BSD IP checksum code was made:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2006-May/063286.html
As part of the thread, Alexander Leidinger's experience while building the
kernel with Intel's C was interesting:
http://lists.freebsd.org/piperm
On 5/22/07, Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/22/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, Linux is tested on big endian, however FreeBSD testing
> > is limited. I would expect the shared code to be ok but the
> > core code is te
Turns out they gave me a T2000 to use, just what everyone needs
in their cubicle :) Now I just have to get it installed.
Jack
Sigh, this just isnt my day, trying to boot the sparc64 april snapshot
and the thing fails during boot, I wouldnt mind checking this endian
issue if I could just get h
Sun4v runs a hypervisor as part of its firmware. On freebsd it
requires a different kernel from sparc64. Getting the same kernel to
work on both would require more re-work of sparc64 than I felt like
doing given that USIII isn't supported.
There isn't currently an ISO image being produced. Cross-
Finally got ifstated working the way I wanted. Thanks to Tom & Nikos.
The port included a man page for ifstated(8) - but was not sufficient
to get a newbie like me going. I found a good addition on openbsd
man pages ifstated.conf(5).
br,
==Sas3==
> -Original Message-
> > -Origin
Hi, all:
Recently I found a paragraph of codes about IPSec replay prevention
that confused me a lot. Could you shed some light on me?
line 2370 to line 2407 in ipsec.c deal with the replay window update.
/if (seq > replay->lastseq) {
/* seq is larger than lastseq. */
diff =
16 matches
Mail list logo
