Re: kern/112710: if_re driver detects incorrect b243a405a405 MAC address on SMC9452TX-1 pci gigabit cards

2007-05-16 Thread Remko Lodder
Synopsis: if_re driver detects incorrect b243a405a405 MAC address on SMC9452TX-1 pci gigabit cards Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: remko Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 16 14:17:56 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: if_re is a networking thing, rea

Re: kern/112654: [pcn] Kernel panic upon if_pcn module load on a Netfinity 5000

2007-05-16 Thread Remko Lodder
Synopsis: [pcn] Kernel panic upon if_pcn module load on a Netfinity 5000 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: remko Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 16 14:20:04 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: This is something networking related, reassign to networkin

Re: kern/112670: [if_tap] stat /dev/tapN leads to panic for N >= 2G

2007-05-16 Thread Remko Lodder
Synopsis: [if_tap] stat /dev/tapN leads to panic for N >= 2G State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: remko State-Changed-When: Wed May 16 16:36:49 UTC 2007 State-Changed-Why: Hello, it is being mentioned that -STABLE has the required fixed, can you please upgrade your station to -

EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Jack Vogel
I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express adapters, I did this more for avoidance rather than a bug fix, and I'm not 100% sure its the right thing, so I thought I would poll everyone, do you have a PCI-X adapter and are using TSO without problems and wish to keep the support

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Andre Oppermann
Jack Vogel wrote: I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express adapters, I did this more for avoidance rather than a bug fix, and I'm not 100% sure its the right thing, so I thought I would poll everyone, do you have a PCI-X adapter and are using TSO without problems and wish t

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Jack Vogel
On 5/16/07, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jack Vogel wrote: > I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express > adapters, I did this more for avoidance rather than a bug fix, and > I'm not 100% sure its the right thing, so I thought I would poll > everyone, do you hav

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Tom Judge
Jack Vogel wrote: I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express adapters, I did this more for avoidance rather than a bug fix, and I'm not 100% sure its the right thing, so I thought I would poll everyone, do you have a PCI-X adapter and are using TSO without problems and wish t

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Jack Vogel
On 5/16/07, Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Jack Vogel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express > adapters, I did this more for avoidance rather than a bug fix, and > I'm not 100% sure its the right thing, so I thought I would poll

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Jack Vogel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express > adapters, I did this more for avoidance rather than a bug fix, and > I'm not 100% sure its the right thing, so I thought I would poll > everyone, do you have a PCI-X adapter and are usin

Re: kern/112654: [pcn] Kernel panic upon if_pcn module load on a Netfinity 5000

2007-05-16 Thread Marius Strobl
The following reply was made to PR kern/112654; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: kern/112654: [pcn] Kernel panic upon if_pcn module load on a Netfinity 5000 Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:59:01 +0200 I thi

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Julian Elischer
Jack Vogel wrote: On 5/16/07, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jack Vogel wrote: > I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express > adapters, I did this more for avoidance rather than a bug fix, and > I'm not 100% sure its the right thing, so I thought I would poll > e

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Jack Vogel
You mean other than net.inet.tcp.tso that is there now? On 5/16/07, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jack Vogel wrote: > On 5/16/07, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jack Vogel wrote: >> > I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express >> > adapters, I did

Re: kern/112670: [if_tap] stat /dev/tapN leads to panic for N >= 2G

2007-05-16 Thread Ludovico Gardenghi
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:37:15PM +, Remko Lodder wrote: > Hello, it is being mentioned that -STABLE has the required fixed, can you > please > upgrade your station to -STABLE and report whether that indeed solved the > problem. > Thanks. Kernel 6.2 STABLE 200705 seems ok. Ludovico -- <[

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Andre Oppermann
Jack Vogel wrote: You mean other than net.inet.tcp.tso that is there now? I don't think another sysctl is necessary for this. -- Andre ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, sen

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Sam Leffler
Jack Vogel wrote: > I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO to PCI Express > adapters, I did this more for avoidance rather than a bug fix, and > I'm not 100% sure its the right thing, so I thought I would poll > everyone, do you have a PCI-X adapter and are using TSO without > problems an

Re: kern/112670: [if_tap] stat /dev/tapN leads to panic for N >= 2G

2007-05-16 Thread Ariff Abdullah
The following reply was made to PR kern/112670; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ariff Abdullah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: kern/112670: [if_tap] stat /dev/tapN leads to panic for N >= 2G Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 05:33:48 +0800 This is a multi-p

Re: kern/112722: IP v4 udp fragmented packet reject

2007-05-16 Thread Mark Linimon
Synopsis: IP v4 udp fragmented packet reject Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 16 22:12:30 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: This does not sound amd64-specific. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=1127

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Sam Leffler
Jack Vogel wrote: > You mean other than net.inet.tcp.tso that is there now? > > On 5/16/07, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jack Vogel wrote: >> > On 5/16/07, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Jack Vogel wrote: >> >> > I introduced a change yesterday that limited TSO t

Re: EM and TSO

2007-05-16 Thread Jack Vogel
On 5/16/07, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jack Vogel wrote: > You mean other than net.inet.tcp.tso that is there now? > > On 5/16/07, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jack Vogel wrote: >> > On 5/16/07, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Jack Vogel wrote: >> >>

problem with my routing I believe

2007-05-16 Thread Tom Cruickshank
Hello, I’m in the process of trying to setup a freebsd box to act as a gateway. This box contains 3 network cards. Here is how it is divided. 1) Network card 1 goes to the modem for internet access. 2) Network card 2 has a network class of 192.168.1.0 and plugs in directory t

Port of the new em(4) to RELENG_6 and some problems with 82540EM

2007-05-16 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Jack, good day. I happened to make a quick and dirty patch for your latest (for the 16.05.2007) em(4) driver from 7-CURRENT. I had seen that you mentioned TSO and 6.3, so I assume that you're going to merge the driver to the RELENG_6 someday, so maybe my effort may be helpful. To my problems. I