On 2007-May-11 10:22:43 +0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am using TCP sockets to measure packet transfer. And I am also not
>looking to optimise the link. I just want to know if this is the usual
>behaviour of the freeBSD TCP or bridge when we apply delay and packet
>loss.
This is nothing to do
All,
I understand that FreeBSD is a volunteer project, but does anyone
have any information regarding the status of the IPsec NAT Traversal
patches and their inclusion with FeeBSD? I have seen them floating
around this list for a few years now. At one point, there was an
objection that conce
On 5/7/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> The new driver I just checked into CURRENT has this fix, I hope its
> going to be in the May snapshot, Stefan, can you try CURRENT to
> see if it solves your problem?
>
> Jack
I have problems with loading if_em
I apologize, I didn't realize that my original message inserted the embedded
links in the snippet of code I posted.
Just wondering if anyone had any thoughts on my questions below, here's a
cleaner listing of the code:
2128 /*
2129 * When new data is acked, open t
Matthew, can you provide links to the patches and surrounding
discussion. It may just be a matter of integration manpower...
* Matthew Grooms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070511 08:08] wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I understand that FreeBSD is a volunteer project, but does anyone
> have any information rega
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Matthew, can you provide links to the patches and surrounding
discussion. It may just be a matter of integration manpower...
Here is a link to the 6.x patch set. I'm not sure where the most recent
patches are for head. Yvan will probably be willing to point us in the
