On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, rms_zaphod wrote:
Hi ,
OK, I have used these ken mods for my file server/nat/router/firewall servers
for years. (kern ops then question)
options FAST_IPSEC
device crypto
With 6.2, with latest (3.13.07) cvsup -L 2 -h `(fastest_cvsup -q -c us )`
/root/stable-supfile
make b
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:50:12PM +, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >Quite a while ago I noticed that our ioctl handlers get the ioctl
> >command via u_long, but ether_ioctl()'s command argument is int.
> >This disarray dates back to 1998, when ioctl functions s
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:01:38AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 01:20:23PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Quite a while ago I noticed that our ioctl handlers get the ioctl
> > command via u_long, but ether_ioctl()'s command argument is int.
> > This disarray
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I have recently started looking at database performance over gigabit
ethernet, and there seems to be a bottleneck coming from the way route
reference counting is implemented. On an 8-core system it looks like
we spend a lot of time waiting for the rtentry mutex:
max
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
I was afraid that this would raise an argument on multipath routing. Let's
temporary do not speak about multipath but just decide what is the correct
way to remove conflicting routes when we are assigning an IP prefix to a
local interface?
IMO when configuring a interface
I've configured a bridge0 interface that bridges fxp0 and em0.
I have a global IPv6 address configured on it and IPv6 works fine.
# ifconfig bridge0
bridge0: flags=8043 mtu 1500
inet x.x.x.82 netmask 0xfff0 broadcast x.x.x.95
inet6 2001:4877:1777:1001::1 prefixlen 64
e
Hello.
I've got two servers configured as follows:
a)
/etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_xl0="inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.101.4 netmask 255.255.255.0"
cloned_interfaces="carp0 carp1 carp2 carp3"
ifconfig_carp0="vhid 1 advskew 100 pass 192.168.101.10"
ifconfig_car
On 15/03/07, Tom Pusateri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've configured a bridge0 interface that bridges fxp0 and em0.
I have a global IPv6 address configured on it and IPv6 works fine.
# ifconfig bridge0
bridge0: flags=8043 mtu 1500
inet x.x.x.82 netmask 0xfff0 broadcast x.x.x.95
Hi,
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I've got two servers configured as follows:
a)
/etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_xl0="inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.101.4 netmask 255.255.255.0"
cloned_interfaces="carp0 carp1 carp2 carp3"
ifconfig_carp0="vhid 1 advskew 100 pass xx
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
man carp:
net.inet.carp.preempt Allow virtual hosts to preempt each other. It
is also used to failover carp interfaces as a
group. When the option is enabled and one of
the carp
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, rms_zaphod wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
>> OK, I have used these ken mods for my file server/nat/router/firewall
>> servers
>> for years. (kern ops then question)
>>
>> options FAST_IPSEC
>> device crypto
>>
>> With 6.2, with latest (3.13.07) cvsup -L 2 -h
11 matches
Mail list logo