bge_intr(), at least for a BCM5705, has races and foot shootings which
result in it sometimes returning without handling all the interrupt
events that it has acked. Then the interrupt doesn't repeat, and the
unhandled events don't get handled a new event (or possibly a timeout)
generates a new in
gz
If anyone from FreeBSD team or else is willing to put it on a host
with
more bandwidth it's more then welcome.
I've mirrored it at http://people.freebsd.org/~flz/local/wpi/wpi-
freebsd-20061109.tgz.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fr
At 08:19 PM 11/8/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
BUT, I've added the FAST_INTR changes back into the code, so
if you go into your Makefile and add -DEM_FAST_INTR you will
then get the taskqueue stuff.
It certainly does make a difference performance wise. I did some
quick testing with netperf and net
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 08:19 PM 11/8/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
BUT, I've added the FAST_INTR changes back into the code, so
if you go into your Makefile and add -DEM_FAST_INTR you will
then get the taskqueue stuff.
It certainly does make a difference performance wise. I did some quick
testing
Does anybody know if the FreeBSD ipv6 stack has passed the IOL Silver
or Gold levels from the University of New Hampshire?
Warner
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Nov 8, 2006, at 06:33, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Landon Fuller wrote:
Nick Barkas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I have added interface
cloning support to the tun(4) and tap(4) drivers.
We maintained backwards-compatible support for devfs cloning,
which is now disabled by default -- it can be r
Florent Thoumie wrote:
On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pleased to tell you i got the latest wpi driver from Damien
Bergamini to work properly on a latest -stable on an Acer laptop.
Nice work!
Unfortunately, it seems that this is still that unfinished driver fr
At 08:19 PM 11/8/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
BUT, I've added the FAST_INTR changes back into the code, so
if you go into your Makefile and add -DEM_FAST_INTR you will
then get the taskqueue stuff.
Not sure why you would want FAST_INTR and polling in at the same
time, but I found that the two are
At 10:51 AM 11/9/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 08:19 PM 11/8/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
BUT, I've added the FAST_INTR changes back into the code, so
if you go into your Makefile and add -DEM_FAST_INTR you will
then get the taskqueue stuff.
It certainly does make a difference perfo
Yes, they are incompatible, I suppose there should be something
that makes it impossible to do, but not building should be a clue :)
Jack
On 11/9/06, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 08:19 PM 11/8/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
>BUT, I've added the FAST_INTR changes back into the code, so
>
Hi,
> On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:50:29 -0700 (MST)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]("M. Warner Losh") said:
> Does anybody know if the FreeBSD ipv6 stack has passed the IOL Silver
> or Gold levels from the University of New Hampshire?
You mean the IPv6 Ready Logo program? (http://www.ipv6ready.org/)
P
> On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:50:29 -0700 (MST),
> "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Does anybody know if the FreeBSD ipv6 stack has passed the IOL Silver
> or Gold levels from the University of New Hampshire?
I don't have a direct answer to this question, but you might be
interest
12 matches
Mail list logo
