On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:21:09AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
%%%
Index: sys/sys/hash.h
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/sys/hash.h,v
retrieving
Hi,
I tried to compile freebsd 6.2 prerelease source with "options IPSEC_NAT_T",
but it said "unknown option "IPSEC_NAT_T"" when I build it
Had IPSEC_NAT_T patch already built into the 6.2 pre source?
If not, where to obtain the patch?
Thanks
S
___
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:56:25PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
Hi.
> I tried to compile freebsd 6.2 prerelease source with "options
> IPSEC_NAT_T", but it said "unknown option "IPSEC_NAT_T"" when I
> build it
>
> Had IPSEC_NAT_T patch already built into the 6.2 pre source?
>
> If not,
in the kernel config file, what if I only define options IPSEC_NAT_T without
defining FAST_IPSEC?
I m not familiar with FAST_IPSEC, if I compile IPSEC_NAT_T with or without
FAST_IPSEC, what s that going to affect my current IPSEC configuration and
connection?
Thanks
S
On 10/13/06, VANHULLEBUS Y
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:27:22AM +1000, Sam Wun wrote:
> in the kernel config file, what if I only define options IPSEC_NAT_T without
> defining FAST_IPSEC?
> I m not familiar with FAST_IPSEC, if I compile IPSEC_NAT_T with or without
> FAST_IPSEC, what s that going to affect my current IPSEC con
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:32:01 +0200
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know what will happen if you define IPSEC_NAT_T, but not IPSEC
> / FAST_IPSEC, guess it will generate the same thing as if you didn'
> define IPSEC_NAT_T.
Or it won't compile because some defines are missing,
Max Laier wrote:
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:32, Yuri Lukin wrote:
Doug Barton wrote ..
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Why isn't anyone working on updating it?
This is a volunteer project. No one has volunteered.
Doug
I think there are some that
Hello,
I have a P4 2.8 box running on an intel MB with a em0 acting as a firewall.
The em0 has multiple tagged vlans on it, no ip assigned to main interface.
Almost clockwork now, 6-7 days after bootup named or dhcpd completly
locks up. I can't even kill -9 the apps.
I have recompiled both apps
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Jonathan Feally wrote:
I have a P4 2.8 box running on an intel MB with a em0 acting as a firewall.
The em0 has multiple tagged vlans on it, no ip assigned to main interface.
Almost clockwork now, 6-7 days after bootup named or dhcpd completly locks
up. I can't even kill -
