[PATCH] Make hash.h usable in the kernel

2006-10-11 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
Hello, I'm working on potential consumer of functions from sys/hash.h. Currently, I can't make them work without modyfication in my sample KLD. This is a patch which fixes the problem: http://people.freebsd.org/~wkoszek/patches/hash.h.0.patch It makes following program.. http://

Re: [PATCH] Make hash.h usable in the kernel

2006-10-11 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:02:41AM +0200, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on potential consumer of functions from sys/hash.h. Currently, I > can't make them work without modyfication in my sample KLD. This is a patch > which fixes the problem: > > http://people.freebsd.or

A way to disable reception of broadcast UDP?

2006-10-11 Thread Yar Tikhiy
Hi all, Is there a well-known way for a UDP application to tell to the system that it doesn't want to receive broadcast datagrams? E.g., it would be very good for TFTP as required by RFC 1123. In general, accepting broadcast UDP is a security flaw unless the higher proto was specifically designe

Re: A way to disable reception of broadcast UDP?

2006-10-11 Thread Ian Smith
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > Is there a well-known way for a UDP application to tell to the > system that it doesn't want to receive broadcast datagrams? E.g., > it would be very good for TFTP as required by RFC 1123. In general, > accepting broadcast UDP is a security flaw unles

Re: A way to disable reception of broadcast UDP?

2006-10-11 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:07:36PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > Is there a well-known way for a UDP application to tell to the > > system that it doesn't want to receive broadcast datagrams? E.g., > > it would be very good for TFTP as required by RFC 1

em blues

2006-10-11 Thread Danny Braniss
the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) dual cpu. running iperf -c (receiving): freebsd-4.100.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec413 MBytes346 Mbits/sec freebsd.6.1 0.0-10.0 sec366 MBytes307 Mbits/sec freebsd-6.

Re: Intel PRO 3945ABG Wireless

2006-10-11 Thread Yuri Lukin
Doug Barton wrote .. > On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > Why isn't anyone working on updating it? > > This is a volunteer project. No one has volunteered. > > Doug > I think there are some that would like to contribute but don't know where to begin. I, for one, enjoy wireless net

Re: A way to disable reception of broadcast UDP?

2006-10-11 Thread Ian Smith
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:07:36PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > > > Is there a well-known way for a UDP application to tell to the > > > system that it doesn't want to receive broadcast datagrams? E.g., >

Re: Intel PRO 3945ABG Wireless

2006-10-11 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Tuesday, October 10, 2006 22:30:29 -0700 Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Paul Schmehl wrote: Why isn't anyone working on updating it? This is a volunteer project. No one has volunteered. I'd volunteer if I had a clue. I'm not a programmer, and my only expo

Re: Intel PRO 3945ABG Wireless

2006-10-11 Thread Max Laier
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:32, Yuri Lukin wrote: > Doug Barton wrote .. > > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > Why isn't anyone working on updating it? > > > > This is a volunteer project. No one has volunteered. > > > > Doug > > I think there are some that would like to contribu

Re: em blues

2006-10-11 Thread Jack Vogel
On 10/11/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) dual cpu. running iperf -c (receiving): freebsd-4.100.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec413 MBytes346 Mbits/sec freebsd.6.1

Re: em blues

2006-10-11 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:06:17 +0200, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) >dual cpu. > >running iperf -c (receiving): > >freebsd-4.10 0.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec >freebsd-5.40.0-10.0 sec413 MBytes346

Re: [PATCH] Make hash.h usable in the kernel

2006-10-11 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:02:41AM +0200, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: I'm working on potential consumer of functions from sys/hash.h. Currently, I can't make them work without modyfication in my sample KLD. This is a patch which fixes the problem: ... T

Re: Problem with IBM NetXtreme 1000-T GigaEthernet Adapter

2006-10-11 Thread Senandung Mendonan
David / list, Some new developments/leads on this issue:- On 8/21/06, Senandung Mendonan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you could attach a dump of dmesg that shows the messages from the > driver that might help too. Here's the dmesg for the dual-port version:- pci5: on pcib4 bge0: mem 0xd

pf.conf + altq problem

2006-10-11 Thread Muhammad Reza
Dear list. My pf.conf not working. I have pf in bridge machine with xl2 to internet firewall and xl1 to internal switch. Bridging is ok. This my simple pf.conf me="172.16.0.228" altq on xl1 bandwidth 100% cbq queue {me,dflt} queue mebandwidth 8Kb queue dflt bandwidth 16Kb cbq (d