Does mpd (multi-link PPP daemon) support IPv6?

2006-09-28 Thread Blue
Hi, all: I want to know whether mpd (multi-link PPP daemon) could possibly support IPv6. When I want to establish a PPTP connection with a PPTP server running mpd, could I use IPv6CP instead of IPv4CP to set up the PPP? If it supports, how could I configure the related parameters in the confi

De-orbitting mrouted

2006-09-28 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Hi, I think it would be a good idea if we de-orbit /usr/sbin/mrouted in 7-CURRENT. Several reasons: 1. DVMRP is not specified for any new multicast installations; PIM is the de-facto standard now. 2. The code generates warnings during a buildworld (see bin/71633) 3. Given point (1) it probab

Re: De-orbitting mrouted

2006-09-28 Thread Andre Oppermann
Bruce M Simpson wrote: Hi, I think it would be a good idea if we de-orbit /usr/sbin/mrouted in 7-CURRENT. Several reasons: 1. DVMRP is not specified for any new multicast installations; PIM is the de-facto standard now. 2. The code generates warnings during a buildworld (see bin/71633) 3. G

[ng_nat]bug w/ traceroute?

2006-09-28 Thread Lytochkin Boris
Hello! I have a router configured for NAT using ng_nat & ipfw. >ipfw: >01050 allow ip from me to any >01100 netgraph 60 ip from 192.168.90.0/24 to not 192.168.0.0/16 out via rl0 >01101 netgraph 61 ip from any to 193.232.121.245 in via rl0 >01200 allow ip from any to any >/etc/ngctl.conf: >mkpeer

Porting the NetBSD ECN SoC project to FreeBSD

2006-09-28 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, will someone port the NetBSD SoC project which implemented ECN to FreeBSD? If not, could someone please write up a nice text with some pointers for our ideas list? Bye, Alexander. -- Any sufficiently advanced bug becomes a feature. http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net:

Re: De-orbitting mrouted

2006-09-28 Thread John Hay
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:55:29AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > Hi, > > I think it would be a good idea if we de-orbit /usr/sbin/mrouted in > 7-CURRENT. Several reasons: > > 1. DVMRP is not specified for any new multicast installations; PIM is > the de-facto standard now. > 2. The code gener

Re: De-orbitting mrouted

2006-09-28 Thread Bruce M Simpson
John Hay wrote: Well what is there to do ipv4 multicast routing then? For ipv6 I have been using the net/mcast-tools package with pim6sd and pim6dd, but it seems that we are a bit thin in the ipv4 field... net/xorp maybe, although it looks like an overkill... I haven't tried it myself though.

Re: De-orbitting mrouted

2006-09-28 Thread Bill Fenner
>I think it would be a good idea if we de-orbit /usr/sbin/mrouted in >7-CURRENT. Do it. Maybe consider making a port if anyone cares to continue to use it. (Gee, I suppose I could do that part ;-) Bill ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: kern/95277: [netinet] IP Encapsulation mask_match() returns wrong results

2006-09-28 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Synopsis: [netinet] IP Encapsulation mask_match() returns wrong results Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->net Responsible-Changed-By: bms Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Sep 28 17:30:09 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: over to net for more discussion http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.c

Re: kern/95277: [netinet] IP Encapsulation mask_match() returns wrong results

2006-09-28 Thread Bruce M Simpson
The following reply was made to PR kern/95277; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: kern/95277: [netinet] IP Encapsulation mask_match() returns wrong results Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:22:46 +0100 This is a multi-part mess

Re: De-orbitting mrouted

2006-09-28 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Bill Fenner wrote: I think it would be a good idea if we de-orbit /usr/sbin/mrouted in 7-CURRENT. Do it. Maybe consider making a port if anyone cares to continue to use it. (Gee, I suppose I could do that part ;-) I count +3 votes in favour. As soon as I get some spare cycles (juggli

Much improved sosend_*() functions

2006-09-28 Thread Andre Oppermann
sender is an AMD Opteron 852 (2.6GHz) with em(4) PCI-X-133 interface and the receiver is a DELL Poweredge SC1425 P-IV Xeon 3.2GHz with em(4) LOM connected back to back at 1000Base-TX full duplex. The patch is available here: http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/sosend+m_uiotombuf-20060928.diff Any

Re: Much improved sosend_*() functions

2006-09-28 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Andre Oppermann writes: > I have rewritten m_getm() to be simpler and to allocate PAGE_SIZE sized > jumbo mbuf clusters (4k on most architectures) as well as m_uiotombuf() > to use the new m_getm() to obtain all mbuf space in one go. It then loops > over it an copies the data into the mbufs by

Re: Much improved sosend_*() functions

2006-09-28 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Andre Oppermann wrote: > over it an copies the data into the mbufs by using uiomove(). sosend_dgram() > and sosend_generic() are change to use m_uiotombuf() instead of > sosend_copyin(). Can you do some UDP testing with 512b, 1K, 2K, 4K, 8K, and 16K packets to see if perfo

ndis troubles - what's my next debugging step?

2006-09-28 Thread Jim Stapleton
First of all, I appologize if this is the wrong place, an earlier request on -questions had no hits, and I need to get this working soon if possible. Although it's mostly internals stuff that's well over my head, I saw a couple driver related questions in the archive, and no one complained, so I a