At Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:14:18 -0700,
Matt Reimer wrote:
>
> Can someone take a look at PR 89061
> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=89061). It contains a
> patch adding an /etc/rc.conf knob to autoconfigure an RFC 3068 6to4
> address.
>
The comments in the PR indicate that awk can't be u
Thank you, this was exactly right. Just had to wait for maintenance
day to try it.
(copying the list for the archives)
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:15:20AM +0200, Robert Blacquiere wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:56:48PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > (asked this first o
Hi,
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:44:18 +0200 (CEST)
> "Julian Stacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jhs> I'm not clear if this is a bug or a config error:
jhs> It seems though my /usr/sbin/ppp was moving traffic
jhs> to & from internet, it was only listening for commands
jhs>
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 12:07:58PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
[]
> Next problem that I have encountered (with FAST_IPSEC) is:
>
> # /sbin/setkey -D
> Invalid extension type
> Invalid extension type
> Invalid extension type
> Invalid extension type
> Invalid extension type
> Invalid extension
FYI.
--- Begin Message ---
andre 2006-09-17 13:33:30 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/dev/bce if_bce.c
sys/dev/bge if_bge.c
sys/dev/em if_em.c
sys/dev/ixgb if_ixgb.c
sys/dev/nfe if_nfe.c
sys/dev/nge
On 9/17/06, VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Make sure your ipsec-tools port have been recompiled after your system
has been patched / compiled / upgraded, and use
/usr/local/sbin/setkey.
FreeBSD's setkey does not (yet ?) support NAT-T extensions at all.
I tried both /sbin/setkey an
> I have no environment for testing this. Could you try this patch?
Yes certainly, thanks a lot, delighted to get a reply & will report back soon.
--
Julian Stacey. BSD Unix C Net Consultancy, Munich/Muenchen http://berklix.com
Mail Ascii, not HTML. Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kop
Hi list.
I've found bsdproxy using kevent/kqueue(2) system calls.
Is there any http/https and/or socks proxy using this mechanism?
Thanks
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:10:47 +0900 Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:44:18 +0200 (CEST)
> > "Julian Stacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> jhs> I'm not clear if this is a bug or a config error:
> jhs> It seems though my /usr/sbin/ppp was m
Sam Leffler wrote:
> Hans Nieser wrote:
>> Sam Leffler wrote:
>>> Hans Nieser wrote:
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a
FreeBSD aphax-laptop.lan 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Thu May 11
07:17:09 CEST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/APHAX-LAPTOP i386
>>> Are you
Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
> Sam Leffler wrote:
>> Hans Nieser wrote:
>>> Sam Leffler wrote:
Hans Nieser wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a
> FreeBSD aphax-laptop.lan 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Thu May 11
> 07:17:09 CEST 2006
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/s
Anton Butsyk wrote this message on Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 21:40 +0300:
> I've found bsdproxy using kevent/kqueue(2) system calls.
> Is there any http/https and/or socks proxy using this mechanism?
I believe squid makes use of kqueue, or our port of squid has patches
the uses it...
--
John-Mar
Brian Somers wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:10:47 +0900 Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:44:18 +0200 (CEST)
> > > "Julian Stacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > jhs> I'm not clear if this is a bug or a config error:
> > jhs> It
Hi,
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:35:57 +0200
> "Julian H. Stacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> AFAIR I had trouble getting that code to work and was advised at
> the time that I'd just get the mapped port for free. I haven't
> been using IPv6 on production machines for some time, so I haven't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On September 16, 2006 2:04:38 AM -0400 Tim Allender
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure if I should post this here or straight to the pfSensse list.
I suspect this kind of thing is a faulty NIC but since I've not seen it
before I'm not sure:
vr0: receive error (8
15 matches
Mail list logo