Hi Marcelo,
Marcelo Gardini do Amaral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/09/2006
16:55:21:
> I would like to discuss a little bit more about UDP performance. I've
> made some tests and the results may have some value here.
>
> In this test is easy to see that there is something different in the
>
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:49:46AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Andrew Thompson wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:07:25PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >>With the recent addition of a 16bit field for TSO into the mbuf packet
> >>header we've got 16bits left over. I've reserved these bits f
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:49:46AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:07:25PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
With the recent addition of a 16bit field for TSO into the mbuf packet
header we've got 16bits left over. I've reserved th
Hello.
I am trying to limit arp-broadcast between member-IF on a bridge
(if_bridge) with no luck.
I have the following sysctls set:
net.link.bridge.pfil_member: 1
net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge: 1
net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip: 1
I am using PF for filtering - do I have to use IPFW to limit
arp-b
On Sep 12, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Now I can't but do some nitpicking :-) In if_vlan.c, the "inenc"
variable is set to 0 or 1 depending on the branch taken in the
if-else clause. Then why to initialize it at its definition? I
think that the better style would be:
int i
Hello all
I'm confused a bit.
Here's what I have: a firewall (with address A) and a proxy host (in internal network) with address
B.
Both running latest FBSD 6.1-stable. Addresses are (samples) "A" -192.168.0.1 and
"B" - 192.168.0.2.
Both kernel are compiled with options "ipfirewall" and "ipfi
