Re: problems with ng_fec

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:56:48PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > Hi, > > (asked this first on -questions, but it seems that this exceeds their > wisdom...) > > I'm using a recent -current on amd64, and trying to use ng_fec to > hopefully provide a wide-bandwidth connection with cable-level

Re: Two ISP connections with Natd

Am 04.09.2006 um 12:40 schrieb David Bila: I am running freebsd as getway for my office. I Just acquired second Internet last week. I wonder if there is a way trhough route add - net and ipfw I can manipulate my traffic in a such way that some traffic to a selected network can go through one I

Re: ipv6 host routes

Ok, I still have no joy adding an IPv6 route. Can anybody tell me what I do wrong? What I understand from the route(8) man page is that this command should work: route add -inet6 rtr2 rtrg -interface Where rtr2 is the destination address and rtrg is my address on the interface that rtr2 is conn

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

Jack Vogel wrote: On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you do the ifconfig changes there will need to be a small amount of > code added to em_ioctl() but it should be trivial. > > You want me to reissue a driver patch with changes for your code? Yes, please do so. I've go

Re : ipv6 host routes

Hi John, I use v6 hosts routes on FreeBSD 4.11. The main purpose for me is through ipv6 in ipv6 tunnels, so it is different. I tried to install host routes as you do: In your case rtr2 and rtrg seem to be on the same prefix. In this case the prefix route is enough, but if you want to add a hos

Moving ethernet VLAN tags into the mbuf packet header (from mtags)

reebsd.org/~andre/vlan_pkthdr-20060907.diff The big advantage is that we don't have to do a UMA zalloc for very incoming vlan tagged packet. The m_pkthdr.ether_vlan field is always present and its validity depends on the M_VLANTAG flag. Testing & reviews encour

NEW IDEAS

Hello, freebsd-net. What about this? Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>KES wrote: >> Hello, archie. >> >> How about 'ALTQ' node? or may be 'queue' node >> for packets scheduling >> >> in--->|policy|--->out >> >> policy may be CBQ, PRIO, HFSC or HTB >> >> I want this: >> >> in-->HTB-->

Re: Moving ethernet VLAN tags into the mbuf packet header (from mtags)

lable here: http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/vlan_pkthdr-20060907.diff The big advantage is that we don't have to do a UMA zalloc for very incoming vlan tagged packet. The m_pkthdr.ether_vlan field is always present and its validity depends on the M_VLANTAG flag. Testing & reviews encou

patch to not route on down interfaces

Hi guys, We "hack" a feature to have 2 NIC's configured with the same IP and netmask. We down one and up the other to bounce between then. We also set the MAC's to be the same. This fixes a few routing problems in which the route would be tied to the down interface and not the up one :-( --- .

Re: Problem with uipc_mbuf.c

Andre: Without the "fix" SCTP leaks mbufs when running netpipe.. for some reason my other tests (utilites) do not do so.. but I think it has to do with the back-and-forth nature of netpipe.. it sends and then receives constantly while most of the other things I play with have a source and a sink.

Re: NEW IDEAS

[ Your caps-lock is broken ] On Thursday 07 September 2006 20:21, KES wrote: > Hello, freebsd-net. > > What about this? > > Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>KES wrote: > >> Hello, archie. > >> > >> How about 'ALTQ' node? or may be 'queue' node > >> for packets scheduling > >> > >> in---

Re: Moving ethernet VLAN tags into the mbuf packet header (from mtags)

mbuf mtag. > > The change is rather mechanical. Patch available here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/vlan_pkthdr-20060907.diff > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netgraph/ng_vlan.c,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.3 ng_vlan.c --- netgraph/ng_vlan.c 20 Apr 2005 14:19:20 -00