On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, John Polstra wrote:
I question whether you need a fallback software if_snd queue at all
for modern devices such as the Intel and Broadcom gigabit chips. The
hardware transmit descriptor rings typically have sizes of the order
of 256 descriptors. I think if the ring fills u
I often need to move my laptop around the house and have temporary
network outages (no wireless). I've noticed that any active TCP
connections drop out fairly quickly - some checking with tcpdump shows
that there is only 60 seconds between the first transmit attempt and
the last re-transmit. This
Synopsis: FreeBSD arp poison patch
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->suspended
State-Changed-By: bms
State-Changed-When: Wed Aug 2 13:01:22 UTC 2006
State-Changed-Why:
Not ready for prime time, IMHO.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: bms->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: bms
Responsible-Changed-Wh
Synopsis: [if_vr] VT6103 NIC broken since 5.2
Responsible-Changed-From-To: bms->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: bms
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Aug 2 13:06:56 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Disowned... reorganising
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=63721
___
Synopsis: A new protocol family, PF_IPOPTION, to handle IP options at socket
interface
Responsible-Changed-From-To: bms->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: bms
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Aug 2 13:23:39 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
ENOTIME
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=1987
Synopsis: Problem with the timestamp option when flag equals zero
Responsible-Changed-From-To: bms->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: bms
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Aug 2 13:28:14 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Back to the free pool.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=31686
_
Synopsis: [PATCH] for static ARP tables in rc.network
Responsible-Changed-From-To: bms->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: bms
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Aug 2 13:30:40 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
ENOTIME. If big ARP changes happen, then this should probably be
taken on again and looked
I cannot get netgraph to work with 10Gig interfaces
on FreeBSD 6.1. No errors, but no traffic seen.
Config works with 1 Gig interfaces. Anyone know why?
ngctl mkpeer . eiface hook ether
ngctl mkpeer ngeth0: one2many lower one
ngctl connect $if1: ngeth0:lower lower many0
ngctl connect $if2: ngeth
Hello everybody,
I believe I may have stumbled across a bug in the arp program and
the reproduction is simple (and should be easy to verify) so I'll
just jump to the point.
This is on 6.1-RELEASE-p3 i386
I discovered this while trying to create proxy-arp entries for a
subnet of a network I was
When is FreeBSD going to support the 82563EB/82564EB? Do we have anything yet?
http://www.intel.com/design/network/products/lan/docs/82563_64_docs.htm
--
BSD Podcasts @:
http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/
http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/
___
freebsd-net@f
On 8/2/06, Deuskar, Prafulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>When is FreeBSD going to support the 82563EB/82564EB? Do we have
anything
>yet?
>
>http://www.intel.com/design/network/products/lan/docs/82563_64_docs.htm
>
Have you tried the 6.0.5 driver from Intel's website?
http://downloadfinder.int
Nikolas Britton wrote:
No I have not tired this, I didn't even know Intel made FreeBSD
drivers... I went looking on the site early but couldn't find
anything. Do you know if they are any good?... I'll check it out,
thanks.
It is essentially the same driver that FreeBSD uses, but the one
provid
Hi list,
Is there any interest or plans underway to port the trunk(4) feature
from OpenBSD? OpenBSD's trunk(4) appears to be exactly what I'm looking
for, but there doesn't appear to be anything I can find on a port to
FreeBSD.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=trunk&sektion=4
13 matches
Mail list logo
