Dear current folk, I'm forwarding this thread from the -net list where I
asked the question, is it possible to have more than one IP address in a
jail? The answer is yes, with Pawel's patch. The question here is can
I pursuade anyone to commit this to head and MFC it please? The
motivation is si
Josef Karthauser (joe) writes:
> Dear current folk, I'm forwarding this thread from the -net list where I
> asked the question, is it possible to have more than one IP address in a
> jail? The answer is yes, with Pawel's patch. The question here is can
> I pursuade anyone to commit this to head a
Hello All.
I have a strange problem with VPN connection. PPP can't set IP
address for interface. I use pptpclient by commands:
#route add 82.198.6.19 192.168.1.200
#pptpclient 82.198.6.19 vpn
If I route to 82.198.6.19 by #route add 80.82.6.0/24 192.168.1.200
connection su
[hopefully not off topic, and maybe an interesting chance for
FreeBSD-related people who happen to be around to get in touch]
just a short reminder that from sep.11-15 the ACM SIGCOMM 2006
conference (and workshops and tutorial) will be held in pisa,
with myself playing the general chair for the e
Robert Watson writes:
> tear-down magic. What Solaris does here, FYI, is basically add a lock
> around
> entering the device driver via their mac layer in order to prevent it from
> "disappearing" while in use via the ifnet interface. I'm not sure if we
> want
At least for GLDv2, this
Am 01.08.2006 um 10:41 schrieb Josef Karthauser:
I need to run a second SSL web server inside of a
jail, however that needs another IP address because SSL is
incompatible
with HTTP/1.1.
Depending on who you need to sign your certificate, you might be able
to use multiple host names with a
Am 01.08.2006 um 04:43 schrieb Alexandre Martins Garcia:
Hello everybody,
I have a modem connected to my freebsd machine in ethernet, so to
have a configuration from my ISP I did:
hydrus[/home/amg]# dhclient fxp0
...
No DHCPOFFERS received.
No working leases in persistent database - sleepi
Robert Watson writes:
>
> 5BOne of the ideas that I, Scott Long, and a few others have been bouncing
> around for some time is a restructuring of the network interface packet
> transmission API to reduce the number of locking operations and allow
> network
> device drivers increased con
Robert Watson writes:
> The immediate practical benefit is
> clear: if the queueing at the ifnet layer is unnecessary, it is entirely
> avoided, skipping enqueue, dequeue, and four mutex operations.
This is indeed nice, but for TCP I think the benefit would be far
greater if somebody wo
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 02:43:22AM +, Alexandre Martins Garcia wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I have a modem connected to my freebsd machine in ethernet, so to have a
> configuration from my ISP I did:
>
> hydrus[/home/amg]# dhclient fxp0
> DHCPDISCOVER on fxp0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interva
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Robert Watson writes:
> The immediate practical benefit is clear: if the queueing at the ifnet
> layer is unnecessary, it is entirely avoided, skipping enqueue, dequeue,
> and four mutex operations.
This is indeed nice, but for TCP I think the b
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> - The ifnet send queue is a separately locked object from the device driver,
>meaning that for a single enqueue/dequeue pair, we pay an extra four lock
>operations (two for insert, two for remove) per packet.
Going forward, especially now th
Robert Watson writes:
>
> Jack Vogel at Intel has previously talked about having TSO patches for
> FreeBSD
> to use with if_em, but was running into stability/correctness problems on
> 7.x.
> I e-mailed him a few minutes ago to ask to take a look at the patches.
> Since
> I've not
Robert Watson writes:
>
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> > > - The ifnet send queue is a separately locked object from the device
> > > driver,
> > >meaning that for a single enqueue/dequeue pair, we pay an extra four
> > > lock
> > >operations (two for insert,
Hi All,
I have a routerboard with two ethernet ports (sis0 and sis1). I've been trying
top setup a bridge and also run the dhcpd server on it. I've setup sis0 with an
IP address and sis1 is just marked up in rc.conf. The bridge seems to work
because if I statically assign an IP address to a lap
Purushotham Nayak wrote:
Hi All,
Hey!
Here is a thought, don't setup dhcp server on a bridge. I tried to use
firewalling on this but it works differently than in linux where you can
control the traffic with --physdev-in -out, you can't determine that
which card where the traffic come fro
16 matches
Mail list logo
