BC> Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 18:15:21 +0100
BC> From: Brian Candler
BC> [I]n theory you might be able to find a modem which is physically
BC> connected as ISDN BRI but which supports v90 analogue modulation)
Ascend MAX 1800 or MAX 3000
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A divi
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 01:35:35 +0900,
> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I'm seeing the messages on the machine in Eindhoven (running RELENG_6
>> from a few days/weeks ago), but they also show up on my HEAD machine at
>> home. Below is the output of `ifconfig gif0` on my machine
* JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you try the patch attached below? It's for 6.1-RELEASE, but I
> guess it's pretty easy to apply to CURRENT.
I've applied it on my CURRENT box at home and it works. Hooray! :)
Yours,
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://g-rave.nl/
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2006/01/30] kern/92552 net A serious bug in most network drivers fro
a [2006/02/12] kern
My nfs server is chewing to much CPU even when nobody writes
to nfs partition. The clients are RHES4. I don't know much about
nfs but I followed the steps in handbook. Look:
last pid: 43588; load averages: 0.46, 0.77, 0.81
28 processes: 1 running, 27 sleeping
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% n
Hi,
I want to transmit data between host A and host B. The link between
these two hosts is really bad: PING reports 30% packet loss and about
60 ms return delay. This means if timed out for 1 second, the data must
have been lost.
I keep "net.inet.tcp.rexmit_min" and "net.inet.tcp.rexmit_sl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to transmit data between host A and host B. The link between
these two hosts is really bad: PING reports 30% packet loss and about
60 ms return delay.
OK.
This means if timed out for 1 second, the data must have been lost.
Well, no, that's not necess
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 07:51:33PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to transmit data between host A and host B. The link between
> these two hosts is really bad: PING reports 30% packet loss
How big are the pings? Try
ping -c100 -s1472 x.x.x.x
to send 1500-byte pings (20 bytes IP
On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:51:33 +0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to transmit data between host A and host B. The link
> between these two hosts is really bad: PING reports 30% packet loss
> and about 60 ms return delay. This means if timed out for 1 second,
> the data must have been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to transmit data between host A and host B. The link between
> these two hosts is really bad: PING reports 30% packet loss and about
> 60 ms return delay. This means if timed out for 1 second, the data must
> have been lost.
> I keep "net.inet.tcp.rexmit_mi
> You can take a look at SCPS - http://www.scps.org/ Their protocol is
> used on lossy links with big latency and packet loss (such as
> satellites) and overcomes shortcomings of TCP. It works with divert
> mechanism of FreeBSD and I ported the tap device part as well to both
> NetBSD / FreeBSD (
>
> > You can take a look at SCPS - http://www.scps.org/ Their protocol is
> > used on lossy links with big latency and packet loss (such as
> > satellites) and overcomes shortcomings of TCP. It works with divert
> > mechanism of FreeBSD and I ported the tap device part as well to both
> > NetBSD
Thank you for your answers, Joshua, Marcin, Brian and Chuck.
Actually, I want to configure APACHE to distribute files (several
mega bytes large each) to any Internet visitor.
My server (host A) is served by a non-profitable Internet operator
in China. But most of Chinese Internet use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, I want to configure APACHE to distribute files (several
> mega bytes large each) to any Internet visitor.
>
> My server (host A) is served by a non-profitable Internet operator
> in China. But most of Chinese Internet users (host B) are served by two
>
I believe two points:
1. Receiver should tell sender to re-send as soon as possible.
(But TCP makes receiver purely passive)
2. Receiver should tell sender what is really necessary to re-send.
(Sometimes only a single ACK number of TCP cannot include enough
information)
---
Joshua Blanton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I want to configure APACHE to distribute files (several
mega bytes large each) to any Internet visitor.
My server (host A) is served by a non-profitable Internet operator
in China. But most of Chinese Internet users (host B) are
At Mon, 22 May 2006 18:40:48 +0900,
jinmei wrote:
> Could you try the patch attached below? It's for 6.1-RELEASE, but I
> guess it's pretty easy to apply to CURRENT.
>
> The essential reason of this problem is that the latest kernel regards
> the destination address of a point-to-point interface
> On Mon, 22 May 2006 09:50:37 -0700,
> "George V. Neville-Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Could you try the patch attached below? It's for 6.1-RELEASE, but I
>> guess it's pretty easy to apply to CURRENT.
>>
>> The essential reason of this problem is that the latest kernel regards
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
