Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-21 Thread Brian Candler
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 12:38:31PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Even at 28.8 I am seeing loss with > the connection dropping and seeing dropped packets (e.g. > May 19 12:04:43 soekris4801 ppp[3404]: tun0: Phase: 1: HDLC errors -> > FCS: 1, ADDR: 0, COMD: 0, PROTO: 0)

Re: mbuf denied problem

2006-05-21 Thread Gabor MICSKO
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 14:11 +0200, OxY wrote: > thank you, i'll try it in a couple of days! > it's sad that it's a returning question and no patch from the developers. Yes, It's a returning question. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-net&m=114305945916474&w=2 -- Micskó Gábor HP APS, AI

Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-21 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 05:26 AM 21/05/2006, Brian Candler wrote: On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 12:38:31PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Even at 28.8 I am seeing loss with > the connection dropping and seeing dropped packets (e.g. > May 19 12:04:43 soekris4801 ppp[3404]: tun0: Phase: 1: HDLC er

Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-21 Thread Bill Vermillion
Throwing caution to the wind and speaking without thinking about what was being said on Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:09 , Mike Tancsa blurted this: > At 05:26 AM 21/05/2006, Brian Candler wrote: > >On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 12:38:31PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> Thanks for the reply. Even at

Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-21 Thread Brian Candler
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:09:23AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > The internal USR seems to correctly see the carrier drop and PPP > hence sees it. However, the 2 external Intels I am experimenting > with on the USB serial ports do not. USB-serial adaptors tend to be very broken, unfortunately. I

Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-21 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 21 May 2006 at 11:09:23 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 05:26 AM 21/05/2006, Brian Candler wrote: > >On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 12:38:31PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > Thanks for the reply. Even at 28.8 I am seeing loss with > > > the connection dropping and seeing dropped packe

Re: mbuf denied problem

2006-05-21 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 20 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote: On Fri, 19 May 2006, OxY wrote: i have a problem with mbuf... when all my free memory is gone ( i have 2gb ram) and memory allocation looks like this: I recently received an informal problem report that there is a problem with the "denied" statisti

Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-21 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 01:15 PM 21/05/2006, Brian Candler wrote: On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:09:23AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > The internal USR seems to correctly see the carrier drop and PPP > hence sees it. However, the 2 external Intels I am experimenting > with on the USB serial ports do not. USB-serial adapt

Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-21 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 11:49 AM 21/05/2006, Bill Vermillion wrote: And when performing fax from email - using sendmail incoming and routing to fax [in the early days of the current 'net before many people had 'net connections] the MT's were the only ones that worked with virtually ever target fax machine. Thanks,

Re: improving transport over lossy links ?

2006-05-21 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 02:53 PM 21/05/2006, Ian Smith wrote: > Its not so much data corruption of packets on the wire, but > the modem dropping the connection, retraining and > renegotiating. When the retrains and re negotiations happen, this > can cause problems for the VPN as keep alives are missed,

Re: mbuf denied problem

2006-05-21 Thread Peter J. Blok
On Sunday 21 May 2006 21:28, Robert Watson wrote: > On Sat, 20 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 19 May 2006, OxY wrote: > >> i have a problem with mbuf... when all my free memory is gone ( i have > >> 2gb ram) and memory allocation looks like this: > > > > I recently received an informal

Re: mbuf denied problem

2006-05-21 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Peter J. Blok wrote: On Sunday 21 May 2006 21:28, Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 20 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote: On Fri, 19 May 2006, OxY wrote: i have a problem with mbuf... when all my free memory is gone ( i have 2gb ram) and memory allocation looks like this: I rec