Re: [patch] ipfw packet tagging

2006-05-13 Thread Vadim Goncharov
12.05.06 22:56 Luigi Rizzo wrote: A question about features: is it worth adding functionality of matching range of tags? For example: ipfw add pass ip from any to any tagged 1-5,10,20 i think it is a useful feature, and if you reuse the existing code for matching port ranges etc to implement

Re: [patch] ipfw packet tagging

2006-05-13 Thread Julian Elischer
Vadim Goncharov wrote: 12.05.06 22:56 Luigi Rizzo wrote: A question about features: is it worth adding functionality of matching range of tags? For example: ipfw add pass ip from any to any tagged 1-5,10,20 i think it is a useful feature, and if you reuse the existing code for matching por

Re: [patch] ipfw packet tagging

2006-05-13 Thread Vadim Goncharov
13.05.06 @ 16:38 Julian Elischer wrote: A question about features: is it worth adding functionality of matching range of tags? For example: ipfw add pass ip from any to any tagged 1-5,10,20 i think it is a useful feature, and if you reuse the existing code for matching port ranges etc to i

Re: vlan/bridge problems..

2006-05-13 Thread Evren Yurtesen
Doug Ambrisko wrote: Julian Elischer writes: | Evren Yurtesen wrote: | > Doug Ambrisko wrote: | > | >> Evren Yurtesen writes: | >> | I tried to bridge vlan with ethernet but I am having troubles. | >> | | net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: fxp0:2,fxp3:2,fxp2:3,vlan0:3 | >> | net.link.ether.bridge: 1 | >

[PATCH] Re: IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS story.

2006-05-13 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Hello, On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 02:12:27PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > Therefore, joining the same group 20 times on different interfaces > would exceed IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS. > Fixing this in any way would still break the ip_mroute_kmod ABI and > as such is a HEAD change. A patch for this issue,

Re: [PATCH] Re: IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS story.

2006-05-13 Thread Stephen Clark
Bruce M Simpson wrote: Hello, On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 02:12:27PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: Therefore, joining the same group 20 times on different interfaces would exceed IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS. Fixing this in any way would still break the ip_mroute_kmod ABI and as such is a HEAD change.

Re: [patch] ipfw packet tagging

2006-05-13 Thread AT Matik
On Saturday 13 May 2006 07:08, Vadim Goncharov wrote: > > > > would be cool however. > > May be, but I can't imagine a real situation where it can be useful, > as tables already contain IP adresses. Can you give a real-life > example where it helps ? cool = good may be = wonderful can't imagine =