Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nash Nipples wrote:
>hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
>
> "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
> but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
> wont work:
> WARNING: RunAsUser for MSP ignored
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:47:48AM -0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
>hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
>
> "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
> but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
> wont work:
> WARNING: RunAsUser for MSP ignore
Hi,
I've already posted this on freebsd-stable@ but maybe freebsd-pf or
freebsd-net is a more appropriate place...
it seems that carp is broken on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE when an inet6
address is configured on a carp interface. Since I upgraded from 6.0 to
6.1 (today) I can't see IPv6 carp advert
how can i ask sendmail to give up an email to "another" smtp agent when the
destination user is considered local but not trusted to run a different
submit.cf basicly it could turn into a possible leak attempt unless its defined
in a local "but not really local" routing table which "implies not!
Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:47:48AM
-0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
>hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
>
> "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
> but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
> won
The door open and in walked trouble - disguised as our our old
nemesis Nash Nipples, who uttered, at Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:27 :
> Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nash Nipples wrote:
> >hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
> > "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works
Bill!! you are my superman! lol i dont even know how to thank you.
all i had to do is recompile the sendmail!! it is truly flexible and
ununinstallable. :) mailertable did the thing. i would like to consider the
problem to be solved. if no objections pending?
next time i will pay more time
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:23 , while impersonating an expert on
the internet, Nash Nipples sent this to stdout:
> Bill!! you are my superman! lol i dont even know how to thank you.
I've been running sendmail since it became more civilized in the
early 1990s after running smail for awhile.
> a
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 06:19:59AM -0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
> Upgrade to exim - *any* mail routing policy you can think of can be
> implemented in exim.
>
>lol thanks! i've read about it and i think its awesome but yet i dont
>know how do i uninstall sendmail?
It's part of the
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:28:01PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
A user recently reported a problem with running into IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS
on a system running FreeBSD with IPv4 forwarding enabled, and running
the OSPF routing protocol.
More background
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:28:01PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
A user recently reported a problem with running into IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS
on a system running FreeBSD with IPv4 forwarding enabled, and running
the OSPF routi
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Stephen Clark wrote:
I'm loosely of the opinion that the membership array should be variable
length, and that we should default it to 20, but have a significantly
larger maximum. It's not horribly efficient, but also wouldn't be so
particularly terrible either.
I think
12 matches
Mail list logo
