On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would it be possible to improve the behaviour of the TCP protocol
> implementation so that out-of-order reception was acceptable?
Possibly - but if your FreeBSD box is acting as a router, and it re-orders
packets in transit to t
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Brian Candler wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to improve the behaviour of the TCP protocol
implementation so that out-of-order reception was acceptable?
Possibly - but if your FreeBSD box is acting as a router
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 15:57 +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
> I just released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a
> patchset for 6.x, get it here:
> http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz
>
> To apply it:
>
> cp libalias_ipfw.patch /usr/src
> cd /usr/src
> patch
On 5/2/06, Iasen Kostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Btw what is the status of the multi-session to the same
point PPTP NAT (e.g call ID tracking) ?
PF's NAT has the same problem. We have this come up quite often on
pfSense where someone wants to make multiple connections through the
fir
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:38:35PM +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
> Have you done any performace comparisons with pf's NAT ? I realy would
> prefer libalias based kernel NAT than pf because libalias works better
> with ftp, irc dcc and things like that (VoIP would be nice too :P ). So
> the only reason
Hello.
I think I should give some 'real world' examples.
/etc/rc.firewall:
[Ss][Hh][Aa][Pp][Ee][Rr])
setup_loopback
. /etc/rc.shaper
${fwcmd} add 65000 pass all from any to any
;;
/etc/rc.shaper:
${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 512Kbit/s
${fwcmd} pipe 2 config bw 512Kbit/s
${fwcmd} add pipe 1
I see that.
But if I got this right, I cannot set up speeds individually.
We have different speeds for each host.
Thanks for your time.
> On 2006-05-01T22:12:00-0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Please, take a look in my previous post.
>> I guess the problem lies with IPFW and dummynet.
>> How d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I think I should give some 'real world' examples.
/etc/rc.firewall:
[Ss][Hh][Aa][Pp][Ee][Rr])
setup_loopback
. /etc/rc.shaper
${fwcmd} add 65000 pass all from any to any
;;
/etc/rc.shaper:
${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 512Kbit/s
${fwcmd} pipe 2 config bw 512Kb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I think I should give some 'real world' examples.
/etc/rc.firewall:
[Ss][Hh][Aa][Pp][Ee][Rr])
setup_loopback
. /etc/rc.shaper
${fwcmd} add 65000 pass all from any to any
;;
/etc/rc.shaper:
${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 512Kbit/s
${fwcmd} pipe 2 config bw 512Kb
I'm running into a problem with some new dual Opteron servers we just
received yesterday on 6.1-STABLE (-RC now I suppose) amd64 updated as of
today. When booting, it sometimes fails to initialize the onboard
Broadcom gigabit Ethernet:
bge0: mem
0xfc9f-0xfc9f irq 26 at device 5.0 on pci2
An Update,
Last night I tried adding an em0 to the system. It yeilded no results. I
put the internal lans on em0 and ISP-B on bge0. I know the rules is
getting hits as the counters are moving up, but the redirection simply
refuses to happen. Anyone with any thoughts?
Relevant Kernel Options:
On 2006-05-02T14:19:14-0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On 2006-05-01T22:12:00-0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Please, take a look in my previous post.
>>> I guess the problem lies with IPFW and dummynet.
>>> How do you shape your clients?
>>>
>>> Here we have (for each client):
>>>
>>> ipfw
I'm trying to install 6.0 RELEASE on a new laptop, and the NIC wasn't
recognized. It's a Broadcomm NetExtreme 57xx Gigabit NIC. Apparently
the bge driver doesn't work for that? Is there a driver available?
--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The Universit
Julian Elischer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I think I should give some 'real world' examples.
/etc/rc.firewall:
[Ss][Hh][Aa][Pp][Ee][Rr])
setup_loopback
. /etc/rc.shaper
${fwcmd} add 65000 pass all from any to any
;;
/etc/rc.shaper:
${fwcmd} pipe 1 config bw 512Kbit/s
${fwcm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok gotcha
probably the pipes are stored in a list or something.
check the code and see if a hash table woudl be better..
Julian Elischer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I think I should give some 'real world' examples.
/etc/rc.firewall:
[Ss][Hh][Aa][Pp
Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, May 02, 2006 at 17:38 -0700:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> ok gotcha
>
>
> probably the pipes are stored in a list or something.
>
> check the code and see if a hash table woudl be better..
Looks like it's already a hash, though a bit small:
#define
Hi,
I am trying to use a WRT54G with OpenWRT to do WPA with Radius auth, but I'm
not having much luck..
I have WPA-PSK going fine but when I try WPA-EAP it appears to associate OK
but no traffic passes..
I already sent a long message to the OpenWRT forums
http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php
I just replaced a flakey Intel gigabit nic with a BCM5700-based 3Com nic,
thinking that would work better. Silly me. It seems there's a nasty
interaction between the chipset and the nic, which 3Com solved with a
driver release. From the Tyan site:
# Why can't I browse Network Neighborhood w
[mhd_reg_logo.gif]
Security Update Notification
Dear Valued Customer :
As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in
the Bank of America Online Bank system. We recently contacted you
after noticing an issue on your account.We requested information
19 matches
Mail list logo
