RE: ALTQ on GIF Interface - how much trouble to impliment?

2006-05-01 Thread Dmitry Andrianov
Well, I'm not sure FAQ will help you because you probably aready read it. But since you ask these things... :=) ... I suppose you need to use traffic queueing on your internal (LAN) interfaces. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html has examples of doing that. Also, http://www.openbsd.org/faq/

Current problem reports assigned to you

2006-05-01 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2006/01/30] kern/92552 net A serious bug in most network drivers fro f [2006/02/12] kern

haiku bounties for usb stack

2006-05-01 Thread Karl vom Dorff
Haiku Bounties: www.haikubounties.org Is looking for developers to take up their code bounties for a usb stack. Please drop by the site and apply if interested! _ Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft® SmartSc

Having a problem with getting ipfw fwd to work with vlans and bge - 6.1-RC1 amd64

2006-05-01 Thread Jonathan Feally
Hello, I have setup a new firewall and I'm having trouble with it. Perhaps the bge is to blame, perhaps its something else. I'll explain my setup, problem and the workaround to get it going. Box connects to 2 Internal Lans and 2 External Wans. Vlans are mixed untagged and tagged on a single bg

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-05-01 Thread tpeixoto
Hello! Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At this moment, I'm getting more than 50% interrupts and 20% packets lost. you must have something very basic done the wrong way. > Hope so. So I can fix and learn from it! I would suggest to upgrade that box to 6.1. We tri

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-05-01 Thread tpeixoto
Ferdinand Goldmann wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. I did that and compiled the kernel. Then I restarted the system and enabled sysctl kern.polling.enable=1 It seems that it has no effect in the system. Maybe bge driver doesn't like polling? At least from a quick glance in the polling

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-05-01 Thread Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At this moment, I'm getting more than 50% interrupts and 20% packets lost. you must have something very basic done the wrong way. > Hope so. So I can fix and learn from it! I would suggest to upg

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-05-01 Thread tpeixoto
Julian Elischer wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At this moment, I'm getting more than 50% interrupts and 20% packets lost. you must have something very basic done the wrong way. > Hope so. So I can fix and learn from it!

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-05-01 Thread Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At this moment, I'm getting more than 50% interrupts and 20% packets lost. you must have something very basic done the wrong way. > Hope so. So

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-05-01 Thread Julian Elischer
Julian Elischer wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: oops sent to early will resend with full example of binary triage, Could you clarify how to improve the situation with the tools you mentioned? Assuming you can not use "tablearg" yet (it will make this REALLY

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-05-01 Thread Julian Elischer
Julian Elischer wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That would do it.. In all versions of FreeBSD you can use the skipto rule to make sure that only a few rules are run for any address. Use it to to a binary search for the right pipe.' carefully using 'skipto' and 'table' can make it efficient

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-05-01 Thread Julian Elischer
oops, forgot to fix my cut-n- pastes.. corrected triage below.. Julian Elischer wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That would do it.. In all versions of FreeBSD you can use the skipto rule to make sure that only a few rules are run for any address. Use it to to a bin

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-05-01 Thread Michael W. Oliver
On 2006-05-01T22:12:00-0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Please, take a look in my previous post. > I guess the problem lies with IPFW and dummynet. > How do you shape your clients? > > Here we have (for each client): > > ipfw pipe 1 config bw 512Kbit/s > ipfw pipe 2 config bw 512Kbit/s > ipfw add