Re: How to use if_bridge

2006-04-18 Thread Sten Daniel Sørsdal
Fabian Keil wrote: > The example section has the following sentence "Such a con- > figuration could be used to implement a simple 802.11-to-Ethernet bridge > (assuming the 802.11 interface is in ad-hoc mode)." > > I don't get the meaning of the ad-hoc mode part. In my tests if_bridge > worked in

Re: How to use if_bridge

2006-04-18 Thread Fabian Keil
Sten Daniel Sørsdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fabian Keil wrote: > > > The example section has the following sentence "Such a con- > > figuration could be used to implement a simple 802.11-to-Ethernet bridge > > (assuming the 802.11 interface is in ad-hoc mode)." > > > > I don't get the meani

Re: How to use if_bridge

2006-04-18 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 04:41:42PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: > Sten Daniel Sørsdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fabian Keil wrote: > > > > > The example section has the following sentence "Such a con- > > > figuration could be used to implement a simple 802.11-to-Ethernet bridge > > > (assumi

Re: How to use if_bridge

2006-04-18 Thread Fabian Keil
Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 04:41:42PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: > > I tried if_bridge to let QEMU on my laptop talk to the wireless > > network. It worked if the Laptop's NIC was in ad-hoc or hostap mode, > > but failed if the NIC was connected to an access

Re: Libpcap based: packet generator + capture file editor + bridge for IEEE802.3 on FreeBSD

2006-04-18 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:34:12AM -0700, Yeow C.H. wrote: > Thanks Brian. > > Simply put Bit-Twist is smaller, do more, medium specific (Ethernet > II - IEEE 802.3) suite. > > Bittwist (packet generator) does not differs much from tcpreplay > program. I would admit if you say tcprepl

Re: crypto accelerators

2006-04-18 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:44:38PM -1000, Dave Cornejo wrote: > So the question is whether these cards, regardless of their affect on > throughput, increase usable CPU cycles? I have several Soekris 1401 > cards and am wondering if there would be any point to putting them > into some machines that

Re: New version of iwi(4) - Call for testers [regression!]

2006-04-18 Thread Max Laier
est version: http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/new_iwi/20060418.both_nofw.tgz Thanks to Sam, this should work in IBSS (adhoc) mode now. > It seems working fine, again. Thank you! > I forgot to mention one problem which I didn't see with stock iwi > driver on RELENG_6: > >

Re: crypto accelerators

2006-04-18 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:44:38 -1000 (HST), in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >I've read here before (or maybe some other freebsd list) that cards >like the Soekris 1401 don't gain as much as you'd expect due to moving >packets to/from the card over the PCI bus. But the context is usually >one

Re: crypto accelerators

2006-04-18 Thread Dave Cornejo
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:44:38PM -1000, Dave Cornejo wrote: > > So the question is whether these cards, regardless of their affect on > > throughput, increase usable CPU cycles? I have several Soekris 1401 > > cards and am wondering if there would be any point to putting them > > into some mac

Re: crypto accelerators

2006-04-18 Thread Sam Leffler
Mike Tancsa wrote: On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:44:38 -1000 (HST), in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: I've read here before (or maybe some other freebsd list) that cards like the Soekris 1401 don't gain as much as you'd expect due to moving packets to/from the card over the PCI bus. But the cont

GRE over IPv6 configuration

2006-04-18 Thread Affan Basalamah
Hi all, I checked at 7.0-CURRENT release notes, that gre(4) is support IPv6 encapsulation. Could you tell me how I can tunnel IPv6 through gre(4) ? Is anybody ever configure this new thing ? Referring to man 4 gre : (1)route add default B (2)ifconfig greN create (3)ifconf