PR kern/93849 IP checksum broken by pf no-df over bridge

2006-03-04 Thread Adam McDougall
Could someone possibly take a look at this and let me know if it looks 'broken' or if I might be doing something wrong? I am in a crunch to choose a firewall solution within a few weeks and it would help me to know if this issue can be solved. FreeBSD/pf seemed an appropriate solution so far, es

Re: PR kern/93849 IP checksum broken by pf no-df over bridge

2006-03-04 Thread Pieter de Boer
Adam McDougall wrote: Could someone possibly take a look at this and let me know if it looks 'broken' or if I might be doing something wrong? I am in a crunch to choose a firewall solution within a few weeks and it would help me to know if this issue can be solved. FreeBSD/pf seemed an appro

Re: PR kern/93849 IP checksum broken by pf no-df over bridge

2006-03-04 Thread Max Laier
On Saturday 04 March 2006 15:51, Pieter de Boer wrote: > Adam McDougall wrote: > > Could someone possibly take a look at this and let me know if it > > looks 'broken' or if I might be doing something wrong? I am in > > a crunch to choose a firewall solution within a few weeks and it > > would help

Re: PR kern/93849 IP checksum broken by pf no-df over bridge

2006-03-04 Thread Adam McDougall
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 04:02:26PM +0100, Max Laier wrote: On Saturday 04 March 2006 15:51, Pieter de Boer wrote: > Adam McDougall wrote: > > Could someone possibly take a look at this and let me know if it > > looks 'broken' or if I might be doing something wrong? I am in > > a crunch

Re: PR kern/93849 IP checksum broken by pf no-df over bridge

2006-03-04 Thread Adam McDougall
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 03:51:33PM +0100, Pieter de Boer wrote: Adam McDougall wrote: >Could someone possibly take a look at this and let me know if it >looks 'broken' or if I might be doing something wrong? I am in >a crunch to choose a firewall solution within a few weeks and it >

BIND incompatibility

2006-03-04 Thread Yar Tikhiy
Hi there, Just want to remind about a problem I've finally run into myself. There has been a lot of gossip on it, but next to no tech details. Namely, BIND8 will go nuts and spit out tons of error messages per second if its forwarder happens to be BIND9 and "forwarders only" is not in effect. The

Re: ipprecedence ?

2006-03-04 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:10:40AM +0200, S.I wrote: > Thanks for your reply i know this info from google. > The situation is I have a router with many vlans and i want to change > the ipprecedence for some networks as I don't want to check hosts in static > table because > this check is too slowl

Re: Carp on vlan with em driver

2006-03-04 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:03:45PM -0500, Christopher McGee wrote: > Carp, vlans, and em is still not supported in 5.4 release, but I have > read about a patch that works. Can anyone point me in the right direction. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=25292+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2005

make error :|

2006-03-04 Thread Carlos Silva, yourdot-internet.com
Hi, i have upgraded my ports with cvsup and when installing samba i have the following error: " ... Building for libtool-1.5.22_2 . Making all in doc make: don't know how to make libtool14.texi. Stop. ***Error Code 1 " someone have any idea? best regards, carlos silva, http:/

Re: BIND incompatibility

2006-03-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 10:13:06PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > Just want to remind about a problem I've finally run into myself. > There has been a lot of gossip on it, but next to no tech details. > Namely, BIND8 will go nuts and spit out tons of error messages per > second if its forwarder happen