Re: ipfw+dummynet only getting half bandwidth when using routedinterfaces.

2005-07-11 Thread Philip Olsson
fooler wrote: - Original Message - From: "Philip Olsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 2:43 PM Subject: ipfw+dummynet only getting half bandwidth when using routedinterfaces. ipfw pipe 1 config bw 2048Kbit/s ipfw pipe 2 config bw 2048bit/s isnt pipe n

Re: ipfw+dummynet only getting half bandwidth when using routed interfaces.

2005-07-11 Thread Philip Olsson
vladone wrote: Hello Philip, Monday, July 11, 2005, 9:43:39 AM, you wrote: Hello I have a working setup with ipfw+dummynet+bridge where I get proper speeds but I want to have routed interfaces instead and skip the bridge. But when converting to routed interfaces the bandwith th

Re: ipfw+dummynet only getting half bandwidth when using routedinterfaces.

2005-07-11 Thread fooler
- Original Message - From: "Philip Olsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 2:43 PM Subject: ipfw+dummynet only getting half bandwidth when using routedinterfaces. > This is a typo, sorry! > Supposed to be 2048Kbit/s ok > This is my conf: > > ipfw add pipe 1 ip

Re: ipfw+dummynet only getting half bandwidth when using routed interfaces.

2005-07-11 Thread Philip Olsson
fooler wrote: - Original Message - From: "Philip Olsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 2:43 PM Subject: ipfw+dummynet only getting half bandwidth when using routedinterfaces. This is a typo, sorry! Supposed to be 2048Kbit/s ok This is my conf

Re: ipfw+dummynet only getting half bandwidth when using routed interfaces.

2005-07-11 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi Philip, > both counters increase.. and the last one "allow ip from any to any" > > But I guess that is because it matches the rules two times. > I have tried only having one rule but the same problem ( ofcourse only > one way. ) > I have also experimented with recv and xmit without success..

Current problem reports assigned to you

2005-07-11 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net [nfs] [patch] NFS root configurations w

Patch for routing socket bug, please review and test...

2005-07-11 Thread gnn
Hi Folks, Courtesy of OpenBSD, I have taken their changes and modified them to fit our kernel. Please test and let me know about this patch. Thanks, George Index: rtsock.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/net/rtsock.c,v retrieving

two 3C905B's in 5.4

2005-07-11 Thread dave
Hello, I've got a 5.4 box that's going to be a router. It has two 3C905B cards in it and i'm having a blank fill it in as you wish, of a time getting the cards working. Neither card likes dhcp, sometimes i'll start dhclient and the cards will work, sometimes they won't. If i give the -v option

Re: two 3C905B's in 5.4

2005-07-11 Thread HernĂ¡n Freschi
2005/7/11, dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've got a 5.4 box that's going to be a router. It has two 3C905B cards Well I'm not sure if this helps, but I've read that old 3C905's, esp. rev. A have lots of issues, which were solved on Rev. C. 3COM does weird things sometimes, for example, the 3C50

tcp troughput weirdness

2005-07-11 Thread Danny Braniss
while checking out the quality of a switch, I came about a very disturbing dicovery: FreeBSD <-> Linux througput is MUCH better than FreeBSD <-> FreeBSD Setup: 2 blades in the same bladeserver, A running FreeBSD 5.4, B running Linux C is running FreeBSD 5.4 all are connecte

Re: tcp troughput weirdness

2005-07-11 Thread Luigi Rizzo
we need more data points - did you test tcp or udp ? who is sourcing data ? are the bandwidth symmetric (i.e. A-> same as B -> A ? cheers luigi On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 09:21:13AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote: > while checking out the quality of a switch, I came about a very disturbing > dicovery: F

Re: tcp troughput weirdness

2005-07-11 Thread Danny Braniss
> we need more data points - > did you test tcp or udp ? i used iperf: Client connecting to x-dev, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 65.0 KByte (WARNING: requested 64.0 KByte) > who is sourcing data ? all, I tried all combinations, and the numbers are very similar to the ones i posted