Andriy Gapon wrote:
If you are more interested in "road warrior type configurations" rather
than site-to-site (judging from your refrence to special cisco vpn
clients), please take a look at security/vpnc and google:ipsec-tools
(not in the ports yet).
thanks..
ended up using vpnc
I have used the
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:02, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > If you are more interested in "road warrior type configurations" rather
> > than site-to-site (judging from your refrence to special cisco vpn
> > clients), please take a look at security/vpnc and google:ipsec-tools
Milan Obuch wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:02, Julian Elischer wrote:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
If you are more interested in "road warrior type configurations" rather
than site-to-site (judging from your refrence to special cisco vpn
clients), please take a look at security/vpnc and google:ipsec-t
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:35, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Milan Obuch wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:02, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>>If you are more interested in "road warrior type configurations" rather
> >>>than site-to-site (judging from your refrence to speci
If you are more interested in "road warrior type configurations" rather
than site-to-site (judging from your refrence to special cisco vpn
clients), please take a look at security/vpnc and google:ipsec-tools
(not in the ports yet).
I have used the latter with CheckPoint FW (with modifications to
> The latest version from Q's site works (!), but seems limited to
> 100baseTX full-duplex. Even at that nominal speed, the actual data
> transfers seem limited to 2-3 megabytes/s with occasional latency-spikes
> :-(
I just tried the one from Q's site on my Asus K8NNXP nForce MCP3
Networking Adapt
[sorry for the crosspost to -net, but it's relevant there too;
please followup to multimedia@ only]
following a discussion on developers@, i am posting here some
patches for asterisk and the zaptel drivers.
If someone feels like committing these, please go ahead.
I am attaching a description below
> > The latest version from Q's site works (!), but seems limited to
> > 100baseTX full-duplex. Even at that nominal speed, the actual data
> > transfers seem limited to 2-3 megabytes/s with occasional latency-spikes
> >
> > :-(
> I just tried the one from Q's site on my Asus K8NNXP nForce MCP3
>
On 4/20/05, Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The latest version from Q's site works (!), but seems limited to
> > > 100baseTX full-duplex. Even at that nominal speed, the actual data
> > > transfers seem limited to 2-3 megabytes/s with occasional latency-spikes
> > >
> > > :-(
>
>
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 08:27:19AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
S> >change message will report either all state changes or those where at
S> >the time of reporting the state changed relative to the last report.
S> >The same assumption is true for the OpenIGPd we are working on at
10 matches
Mail list logo
