On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 02:40:50PM +0100, Eric Masson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone wip regarding ${subject} area ?
>
> I've found this, but the project seem to have stalled :
> http://listserver.uk.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-users/2002-April/005666.html
>
Do you want to donate a card?
Cheers
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:34:21PM -0800, Kelly Yancey wrote:
Thus reducing the number of packets on the wire from 14 to 9. Obviously
for larger transfers, the difference gets lost in the noise. Nonetheless,
unless someone spots some undesireable sid
> "Ruslan" == Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Ruslan,
Ruslan> Do you want to donate a card?
I have only one left, but can order another one and get it shipped to
you.
Éric Masson
--
un mec qui n'a pas d'emoluments de la part d'Aple qui gagne son argent
de poche en crayona
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 09:37:06AM +0100, Eric Masson wrote:
> Ruslan> Do you want to donate a card?
>
> I have only one left, but can order another one and get it shipped to
> you.
>
Sure. Please let me know when you're ready to ship, and I will
send you my postal address off list.
> Anyways, the _real_ problem is that traditionally, I'd used firewall
> rules for accounting as well as security. To that end, labels are
> very cool. However, they have one rather large defect:
>
> If you're dealing with keep state rules, there seems to be no obvious
> way to account for incom
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net [nfs] [patch] NFS root configurations w
On Monday 14 February 2005 10:43, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > Anyways, the _real_ problem is that traditionally, I'd used firewall
> > rules for accounting as well as security. To that end, labels are
> > very cool. However, they have one rather large defect:
> >
> > If you're dealing with keep sta
> > On Sunday 13 February 2005 22:36, David Gilbert wrote:
> >> Has anyone considered patching the vlan driver to support altq? I
> >> gather that since tun works, so should vlan.
>
> Well... the issue is several fold. Firstly, the router in question is
> talking in trunk mode to a switch which i
> During some testing on an isolated network we have, I found some
> interesting behaviour from a FreeBSD 5.3 host using TCP SACK.
>
> I've detailed this problem fully at:
>
> http://www.wand.net.nz/~stj2/nsc/emu_freebsd.html
>
> PCAP traces and some screenshots from tcptrace graphs can be
