kernel mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD?

Anyone knows about kernel-mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD? (just like tux of linuxI searched several times but failed. -- CHOI Junho [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 1369 7374 A45F F41A F3C0 07E3 4A01 C020 E602 60F5 ___

Current problem reports assigned to you

Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net [nfs] [patch] NFS root configurations w

Re: kernel mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD?

On Monday 07 February 2005 10:20, CHOI Junho wrote: > Anyone knows about kernel-mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD? (just like tux > of linuxI searched several times but failed. No there is not. In my humble opinion it's a *really* bad idea to implement something that vulnarable to external attacks an

Re: ng_nat revisited

Darcy, On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:34:11AM -0800, Darcy Buskermolen wrote: D> It's been a while since the subject of ng_nat appeared on-list, I'm wondering D> if there has been anymore work done on this? Now I'm trying to work on this. I don't guarantee any success in recent future. The first

Re: ng_nat revisited

> D> It's been a while since the subject of ng_nat appeared on-list, I'm > wondering > D> if there has been anymore work done on this? > > Now I'm trying to work on this. I don't guarantee any success in recent > future. > > The first step is porting libalias to be a kernel module. I have alrea

Re: ng_nat revisited

On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:02:55PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: E> > D> It's been a while since the subject of ng_nat appeared on-list, I'm wondering E> > D> if there has been anymore work done on this? E> > E> > Now I'm trying to work on this. I don't guarantee any success in recent future. E>

Re: kernel mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD?

Max Laier wrote: On Monday 07 February 2005 10:20, CHOI Junho wrote: Anyone knows about kernel-mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD? (just like tux of linuxI searched several times but failed. No there is not. In my humble opinion it's a *really* bad idea to implement something that vulnarable to

Re: ng_nat revisited

Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:02:55PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: E> > D> It's been a while since the subject of ng_nat appeared on-list, I'm wondering E> > D> if there has been anymore work done on this? E> > E> > Now I'm trying to work on this. I don't guarantee any success

SACK retransmits multiple segments respond to single dupack

Hello, (B (BI had experiments with FreeBSD SACK implementation. (BFreeBSD SACK retransmits multiple segments respond to single dupack. (BIt breaks "packet conservation principle". (B (BIn OpenBSD SACK implementation, (Bretransmission from SACK hole is limited to single segment. (B"sack_rxmi

[MAIL TEST] Please ignore

I just noticed some problem with my mail server. Please ignore. Milan ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"