Following up to a mail from Jeff Behl and Sean Chittenden back in Dec.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2004-December/006074.html
>From your description, it looks like moving a kqueue based Squid will
help considerably (it looks like there is a version of Squid that
is kqueue based
Yes, I believe the kqueue version of squid would show much better
results. Unfortunately it fails to compile and I have yet the time to
try mucking with it more. I'll get back to the list when I am able to
get it up and running...
jeff
Mohan Srinivasan wrote:
Following up to a mail from Jeff
We have a windows mailserver that relays its outbound to a fbsd
gateway. We changed to a different fbsd gateway running 4.10. Windows
then began having trouble sending to 4.10. Windows "netstat -an"
shows dozens of lines like this:
source IP desitination IP
I think I have found a problem with TCP when run over IPv6.
I set my MSS for TCP to 1460 to allow a full 1500 byte MTU to be
utilized on my systems. (Yes, I see that this does break some things
like communicating via links where PMTUD is blocked and one or more
links restrict MTU to some size less
Been pulling my hair out. Anybody know of a resource for a fairly
complex tunneling scheme. My needs are such that a central hub "Star"
style tunneling scheme simply will not be efficient.
Any info would be appreciated.
TMS III
___
freebsd-net@freebs
Tom Skeren wrote:
Been pulling my hair out. Anybody know of a resource for a fairly
complex tunneling scheme. My needs are such that a central hub "Star"
style tunneling scheme simply will not be efficient.
At some point, complex VPN configurations become more work to setup and
maintain than s
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:01:29 -0800,
> "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think I have found a problem with TCP when run over IPv6.
> I set my MSS for TCP to 1460 to allow a full 1500 byte MTU to be
> utilized on my systems. (Yes, I see that this does break some things
> like
