Hello people!
Whether works or not ALTQ CDNR in FreeBSD 5.3?
--
Andrew Degtiariov
DA-RIPE
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:29:26 +0300, Andrew Degtiariov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello people!
> Whether works or not ALTQ CDNR in FreeBSD 5.3?
>
You don't need that anymore. You can mark packets directly from pf.
> --
> Andrew Degtiariov
> DA-RIPE
>
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:33:47AM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:29:26 +0300, Andrew Degtiariov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello people!
> > Whether works or not ALTQ CDNR in FreeBSD 5.3?
> >
> You don't need that anymore. You can mark packets directly from pf.
I can c
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:43:24 +0300, Andrew Degtiariov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:33:47AM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:29:26 +0300, Andrew Degtiariov
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello people!
> > > Whether works or not ALTQ CDNR in FreeBSD
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:57:41AM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:29:26 +0300, Andrew Degtiariov
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hello people!
> > > > Whether works or not ALTQ CDNR in FreeBSD 5.3?
> > > >
> > > You don't need that anymore. You can mark packets di
When i install freeBSD 4.10 without kame code, my multicast function on
router fail. i try to stream multicast video(vls) from router to vlc
player at client?
=
Ô¸ÄúÓÀÔ¶ÐÒ¸££¬¿ìÀֺͰ²Ïê Happy & Healthy Always ! ^_^ !
¸öÈËÍøÒ³ Homepage:http://planet.time.net.my/sunwaycity/ceyong
¸öÈË·ðѧÍøÒ³ Bu
"Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you wrote:
>
> ><
> >said:
> >
> >> I'm sitting here looking at that man pages for aio_read and aio_write,
> >> and the question occurs to me: ``Home come there is no such thing as
> >> an aio_connect function?''
> >
> >Mostly bec
On a 5.2.1-REL NIS server where NIS maps are updated every hour from a
crontab, I often see yppush going into an endless loop:
0x281220dc in __vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.5
(gdb) bt
#0 0x281220dc in __vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.5
#1 0x28121b3f in strchr () from /lib/libc.so.5
#2 0x28122173
Hi All,
i try to set up quagga to route my VPNs. I use RIP (served by quagga's ripd)
as routing protocol. All works fine, but i have difficulties with equal-cost routes.
Now the problem ...
One of my VPN peer servers has two VPN connections to every one of the ot
> One of my VPN peer servers has two VPN connections to every one of the other
> VPN peers. For quagga these are 2 equal-cost routes. When both of the VPN
> connections are established, quagga randomly preffers one of them and routes all VPN
> traffic via it. When one of the connections is
Hi,
I am having troubles with understanding ipfw mask option (which related
with bw limiting).
For example I want to limit traffic on port 80 from my server to any IP
adress. But all of the connecting IPs should have the same bw which is
configured via mask src-ip am I right?
For example:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you wrote:
>> Anyway, upon further reflection (and further RTFM'ing) I am now inclined
>> towards a distinct dislike for the entire aio_*() family of functions
>> because, as I just now realized, they provide the programmer with a
>> synchronous way (i.e. the aio_e
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 09:29, Andrew Degtiariov wrote:
> Hello people!
> Whether works or not ALTQ CDNR in FreeBSD 5.3?
The "options ALTQ_CDNR" is a dummy at the moment. It introduces a function
pointer in ip_input() that can be used as conditioner hook, but it is not
used at the moment. The
"Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you wrote:
>
> >> Anyway, upon further reflection (and further RTFM'ing) I am now inclined
> >> towards a distinct dislike for the entire aio_*() family of functions
> >> because, as I just now realized, they provide the programmer
Bruce,
Aren't the calls to sysctl_ctx_free() still required?
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Bruce M Simpson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] Make em
I am using the sendmail FEATURE(`dnsbl', on my mail gateway server which feeds
several other mail server, to do lookups from an aggregated black list t1.dnsbl.net.au
It works too well!
Because t1.dnsbl.net.au a comprehensive, aggregated black list, a lot of mail
from poorly configured senders get
Ackerman, Tony wrote:
> Bruce,
> Aren't the calls to sysctl_ctx_free() still required?
They aren't required because the sysctl tree and the sysctl context are
both created by the newbus framework, and also destroyed by the said
framework if a device detaches. However, your comment made me
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you wrote:
>What other events than aio_connect() you are interested in?
Well, I'm glad that you asked, because after my last message in this thread
I realized that (just for the sake of symmetry, if for no other reason) it
would also be swell to have a kernel func
Forgot to respond to this point:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:32 +0300 (EEST),
> Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Speaking of 6to4, if_stf.c does not support setting the MTU, because
> there's no ioctl handler for it. It wouldn't IMHO hurt to be able to
> raise it from the glued-
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote this message on Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 17:19 -0700:
> I would just like to be able to write network clients and/or network servers
> using the kind of radically different programming style that the aio_*
> functions (with their signal-generating asynchronous interrupt capabi
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H(B wrote:
> Forgot to respond to this point:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:32 +0300 (EEST),
> > Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Speaking of 6to4, if_stf.c does not support setting the MTU, because
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
