On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 10:48:32PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > We are going to have triple cut'n'paste: if_tun.c, ng_device.c, if_tap.c.
A> > What about m_uiocopy()? The question is where can we put this function?
A>
A> What about the existing m_uiotombuf() function in kern/uipc_mbuf.c?
Da
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:23:42PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> yes I know, that's how we wrote divert.. (to be independent) netgraph
J> came later..
J> I guess we would have done divert differently if we had done netgraph
J> first..
J> probably would have given ipfw a "hook" command that se
Here is a non-critical patch to bring em(4) into line with other
drivers, by using the sysctl tree created for each device by the
bus framework.
Please review; Thanks.
BMS
Index: if_em.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 09:42:25PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> any objections about commiting this improvement to tun(4)?
Optimal use of mbuf clusters to improve performance is cool.
Please consider committing this once reworked to use m_uiotombuf.
BMS
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Here is a non-critical patch to bring em(4) into line with other
> drivers, by using the sysctl tree created for each device by the
> bus framework.
>
> Please review; Thanks.
> BMS
[patch ripped]
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
Maxime
_
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Here is a non-critical patch to bring em(4) into line with other
drivers, by using the sysctl tree created for each device by the
bus framework.
Does anyone here have an idea why some platforms (like Thinkpad X31 or
i875 Supermicros) have trouble rebooting with 5.3-BETA w
