On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H(B wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:03:47 +0300 (EEST),
> > Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > After the system has been up for a while (a couple of weeks) and/or
> > the ethernet link has gone up/down f
I have Intel 7210 Server Board with Intel PRO/1000 CT (82547EI)
on-board. This NIC work fine under Win2K, but then I boot FreeBSD
5.2.1 I've got a message on console:
em0: Link up 100Mbit full duplex
and boot process suspended at this moment. After approx. 1 minute next
messages appear
em0: W
Hi,
in if.h
#defineIFF_PROMISC0x100/* receive all packets */
#defineIFF_PPROMISC0x2/* user-requested promisc mode */
Do I have to set both on for the promisc to work?
If I only need one of them, then what is the difference?
Regards,
Ming
Pavel V.Zheltobryukhov wrote:
I send Ctrl+C and boot process was continued. But network card doesn't
work. I check cable - it's good. I can't send any ping packet to other
computers. I tried other transmit modes - I switch NIC to 10Mbit half
duplex and 10Mbit full duplex via ifconfig options. No
Hi All
I have a Surecom Ethernet Adapter where there's a FreeBSD driver available
for download at the manufactors website. However I think it is for FreeBSD
4.x because it won't compile on my FreeBSD 5.2.1-release system. Is anybody
up for converting the driver to 5.x, or does anybody know if ther
Hi,
I wonder if there is any ADSL DSLAM PCI adapter?
rik
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Garrett and I discussed what IFF_NOARP should mean about 4-5 years
ago; we decided that it probably menat "no ARP". We discussed
the idea of seperating it out into two flags; "Don't reply to ARP"
and "don't pay attention to ARP" but decided to wait and see what
people thought. 4-5 years is proba
In some mail from Baldur Gislason, sie said:
>
> ipfw is in no way related to the linux firewalls (ipfwadm, ipchains or
> iptables). It is a specially designed firewall for FreeBSD. It isn't
> dependent on ipf, it has it's own in-kernel mechanism. It has a totally
> different syntax. Why FreeBS
As I was setting up DNS for IPv6 on a test network, I started
to get really tired of entering 128-bit addresses, for both
forward and reverse lookups, into DNS by hand. It seemed somewhat
silly to be doing all of this manually when the actual IPv6 hosts
pretty much configure themselves with rtsol(8
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 08:03:03AM +0200, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> >>>You can implement mutexes using semaphores, but semaphores tend to be a
> >>>more expensive since they are more expressive them mutexes.
> >>
> >>Using a benaphore instead would improve speed significantl
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H(B wrote:
> Apparently the most significant change is the memory consumption
> regarding routing table:
>
> In "wrk"
> Memory statistics by bucket size
> Size In Use Free Requests HighWater Couldfree
> 64 2196
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
> we at the Haiku networking team are considering a port of your 5.3
> netstack because it is thread-safe and making the old one (4.x, I think)
> thread-safe is probably a much bigger task.
>
> Now, I saw that the routing code seems to use macros f
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
> > Once GIANT is really gone, it may be nearly that easy. We're a ways
> > from that though.
>
> So, the code is not fully thread-safe yet (we want to drop GIANT)? Then,
> I misunderstood something. Will 5.3 be freed of GIANT?
Including some com
(resending, since the first attempt seems to have failed due to some
DNS-related error)
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:58:41 -0400,
> Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> So, as a result, I tend to think the proposed patch is a reasonable
>> fix to the problem. But please ad
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
we at the Haiku networking team are considering a port of your 5.3
netstack because it is thread-safe and making the old one (4.x, I think)
thread-safe is probably a much bigger task.
do you have a web page that describes what you are doing?
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:39:32 +0300 (EEST),
> Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> 1. do you see massive number of entries with "netstat -rna"?
> Yes.
> # netstat -nra | wc -l
>32468
> #
Okay, to be sure, most of them are IPv6 routing entries, right?
Then please provide some
I'm not sure if this hot the list. Sorry, smtp realy problems
--- Forwarded message ---
From: "Jose M Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:53:18 +0200
Can someone take a look on PR bin/67550?
The protocol correctness maybe not important,
but
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 03:40:04AM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
> (resending, since the first attempt seems to have failed due to some
> DNS-related error)
>
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:58:41 -0400,
> > Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> So,
At Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:30:13 -0400,
ming fu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in if.h
> #defineIFF_PROMISC0x100/* receive all packets */
> #defineIFF_PPROMISC0x2/* user-requested promisc mode */
>
> Do I have to set both on for the promisc to work?
> If I only need one of th
Hi!
_
With best regards,
Yuri A. Mischenko (aka FosteR)
Systems Administrator
Zabaikalye State Pedagogical
University named after
N. Tchernishevsky,
CIT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.zabspu.ru
tel: +7(3022) 267-462
ICQ: 1333253
===
20 matches
Mail list logo
