Hello!
> Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:07:35 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
>> A port should not be reused this fast. Maybe the randomness isn't
>> so random after all and choses the same port over again and again?
>
Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> > Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:07:35 -0500 (CDT)
> > From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> >> A port should not be reused this fast. Maybe the randomness isn't
> >> so random after all a
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:41:51PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > have 16383 non-repeated port numbers before the first repeat).
>
> The random generator indeed works badly. If it was truely random it
> should generate a collision only every (1/range) on average. Maybe
> the arc4random functi
I've got an olde thinkpad and picked up a "Syntax USB-400" 802.11b
interface on a USB stick (heck, it's free after rebate):
http://www.freeafterrebate.info/article.php?story=20040301213230483
When I plug it in, usbd sees it as a generic device:
ugen0: vendor 0x0967 product 0x0204, rev 1.10/1
Hello!
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Barney Wolff wrote:
> Is the problem that the two systems have different ideas of MSL?
I haven't changed default
net.inet.tcp.msl: 3
on server. Note that on client side, connection never goes to TIME WAIT,
because during active FTP server side closes data connec
On 2 Jun, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>> Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:07:35 -0500 (CDT)
>> From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>>
>>> A port should not be reused this fast. Maybe the randomness isn't
>>> so random after a
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> The random generator indeed works badly. If it was truely random it
> should generate a collision only every (1/range) on average. Maybe
> the arc4random function reuses the same or small number of initial vectors
> all over again leading to the same
