About tcp_fastimo() and tcp_slowtimo()

2004-05-19 Thread kwl02r
Dear all, I just follow the book "TCP/IP illustrate vol 2" to understand more about TCP timer. In the book, tcp_fastimo() is invoked each 200 ms to do delay ack job and tcp_slowtimo() is invoked each 500 ms to do the rest of other tcp times. But at the last version of FreeBSD source code, I cou

Re: in_cksum_skip

2004-05-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:48:46AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > You're apparently experimenting with IP multicasting. There was > > a bug with this effect I introduced in ip_output.c,v 1.99.2.43, > > and shortly fixed it in rev. 1.99.2.44. Check that your revision

Re: in_cksum_skip

2004-05-19 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:48:46AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > You're apparently experimenting with IP multicasting. There was > > > a bug with this effect I introduced in ip_output.c,v 1.99.2.43, > > > and shortly fixed it in rev. 1

Re: multicast arp entry

2004-05-19 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > The long answer could be: you could join to a single multicast > > > group on multiple interfaces, and you will be able to receive > > > multicast on all of them, but if you don't have multicast > > > forwarding enabled, only one interface will be used for sending. > >

Re: multicast arp entry

2004-05-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 06:24:30PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > The long answer could be: you could join to a single multicast > > > > group on multiple interfaces, and you will be able to receive > > > > multicast on all of them, but if you don't have multicast

Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?

2004-05-19 Thread Richard Neese
hmm I have 4 serial terminals and they all work fine... I have not tried box to box... I will test ltr today and let you know what I fiind. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any

Re: multicast arp entry

2004-05-19 Thread Eugene Grosbein
> Care to share the experience of how you were able to send multicasts > out several interfaces without tmulticast forwarding using mrouted(8) > or its equivalent? 1. Get FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE :-) 2. Install quagga from _fresh_ port collection (0.96.4 does NOT work) 3. run zebra and ripd, configure a

Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?

2004-05-19 Thread wsk
Richard Neese Write: hmm I have 4 serial terminals and they all work fine... I have not tried box to box... I will test ltr today and let you know what I fiind. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To

Re: multicast arp entry

2004-05-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 08:51:38PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > Care to share the experience of how you were able to send multicasts > > out several interfaces without tmulticast forwarding using mrouted(8) > > or its equivalent? > > 1. Get FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE :-) > 2. Install quagga from _fre

Re: multicast arp entry

2004-05-19 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:12:58PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Care to share the experience of how you were able to send multicasts > > > out several interfaces without tmulticast forwarding using mrouted(8) > > > or its equivalent? > > 1. Get FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE :-) > > 2. Install quagga fr

Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?

2004-05-19 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:05:52PM +0800, wsk wrote: > hi,folks: > It seems that the ttyd0 isn't the dialin line to login , and > the cuaa0 like is both the dialin/out device!under 4.9 above > and 5.X .but the ttyd0 work well under 4.8. > here is my test: > I wanna direct connected two bsd box via

About tcp_fastimo() and tcp_slowtimo()

2004-05-19 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > 1. Did delay ack time still be detected each 200ms? Which function do > this job? If not, can anybody help to describe some detail things about > delay ack time at freebsd source code. The TCP timer code has been completely rewritten. You can see how it works now by grepping for `call

Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?

2004-05-19 Thread Ian Smith
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:05:52PM +0800, wsk wrote: > > hi,folks: > > It seems that the ttyd0 isn't the dialin line to login , and > > the cuaa0 like is both the dialin/out device!under 4.9 above > > and 5.X .but the ttyd0 work well under 4.8. > >

arp: is using my IP address again.

2004-05-19 Thread Russell Adams
Hello, I have seen this question posted twice to the list each without any response. Does anybody out there know if this is possible, a Yes or No, will do if you can't offer anything else. If it is possible then how do we get rid of the Arp/IP conflict problem. This is what I want to do: A tran

Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?

2004-05-19 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:05:52PM +0800, wsk wrote: : > hi,folks: : > It seems that the ttyd0 isn't the dialin line to login , and : > the cuaa0 like is both the dialin/out device!under 4.9 above : > and 5.X .bu

Re: arp: is using my IP address again.

2004-05-19 Thread Mike Hunter
On May 19, "Russell Adams" wrote: > I have seen this question posted twice to the list each without any response. > Does anybody out there know if this is possible, a Yes or No, will do if you > can't offer anything else. If it is possible then how do we get rid of the > Arp/IP conflict problem.

Max NFSD processes

2004-05-19 Thread Eric Anderson
I have several heavily used NFS servers, currently running FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE. I'm getting jammed up with all my nfsd processes being busy, so clients see slow connections to the server. I have the nfsd starting with a count of 20, which is the max set in the nfsd.c file. Are there any risks

Re: Max NFSD processes

2004-05-19 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 19), Eric Anderson said: > I have several heavily used NFS servers, currently running FreeBSD > 4.9-RELEASE. I'm getting jammed up with all my nfsd processes being > busy, so clients see slow connections to the server. I have the nfsd > starting with a count of 20, which

Re: arp: is using my IP address again.

2004-05-19 Thread Russell Adams
Quoting Mike Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On May 19, "Russell Adams" wrote: > > > I have seen this question posted twice to the list each without any > response. > > Does anybody out there know if this is possible, a Yes or No, will do if > you > > can't offer anything else. If it is possible t

Re: Max NFSD processes

2004-05-19 Thread Eric Anderson
Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (May 19), Eric Anderson said: I have several heavily used NFS servers, currently running FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE. I'm getting jammed up with all my nfsd processes being busy, so clients see slow connections to the server. I have the nfsd starting with a count

802.1x, HOSTAP, station association notifications

2004-05-19 Thread Phillip Crumpler
Hi folks! As part of a university project I'm building a IEEE 802.1x authenticator for use with wireless networks. The project is based upon a FreeBSD machine using a Prism based NIC in HOSTAP mode. The role of the authenticator is to selectively allow hosts use of the access point. Part of the

Re: multicast arp entry

2004-05-19 Thread Eugene Grosbein
> > 1. Get FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE :-) > > 2. Install quagga from _fresh_ port collection (0.96.4 does NOT work) > > 3. run zebra and ripd, configure as usual. > > > They apparently do the thing equivalent to mrouted(8), and that's > not what I've understood from your email. Thanks anyway. ;) By the

sk0 in 5.1.0

2004-05-19 Thread Rick Richard
I'm having issues with a SysKonnect 9843 under FBSD 5.1. The card works fine on FBSD 4.9, but miibus cannot attach to it under 5.1. It complains that "No PHY found!," naturally, and then dies. If anyone has some insight on this, it would be greatly appreciated. -Rick ___