Having a problem with a very simple freevrrp config.
This is FreeBSD 5.2.1p5
/usr/local/etc/freevrrpd.conf :
[VRID]
serverid = 1
interface = em0
priority = 255
addr = 192.168.13.209/32
password = dlvip
#masterscript = "/usr/local/bin/master_script.sh"
#backupscript = "/usr/local/bin/backup_scrip
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 06:08:52PM -0700, Tom Arnold wrote:
> Having a problem with a very simple freevrrp config.
> This is FreeBSD 5.2.1p5
A bit more digging and I found that there was an em0 fix, so I cvsup'd and
got it working. Failover is painfully slow ( read : not usable ) so I think
my so
On May 11, 2004, at 6:08 PM, Tom Arnold wrote:
Hardware is a Dell 650 with, of course, onboard Intel Pro/1000.
Also using freevrrp on other Dell650's, but they came with Pro/100's (
fxp )
and work fine, so I'm leaning towards hardware or driver quirks, but
any
ideas appreciated.
Do you have fil
On May 11, 2004, at 6:38 PM, Tom Arnold wrote:
A bit more digging and I found that there was an em0 fix, so I cvsup'd
and
got it working. Failover is painfully slow ( read : not usable ) so I
think
my solution is to put fxp cards in these machines.
Interesting. Can you see why it's slow? And
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:02:51PM +0200, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I dont understand, looking at "man 4 route", how to use the RTM_IFINFO
> message of a Routing Socket.
>
> I mean, do I have to make a "write" on the socket with a
> "struct if_msghdr" of type = RTM_IFINFO and l
Hi,
> On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:21:13 +0200
> Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lukasz> Well i *have*got* one v4ADDR that is assigned to my nat/router-box. I
Lukasz> have also configured that it should pass all packets that are not part
Lukasz> of some known connections (from M1 M2 .
Hello,
I've made several things:
1. Add a simple "rt_ifmsg(ifp)" function call inside
/dev/wi/if_wi.c, at function: wi_update_stats
(FreeBSD-4.9)
2. Then I try to get those notifications with the small program that follows,
but I can not get anything.
Where could the problem be ?
Thanks a lot!
On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:59:31 +0900 Ume wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:21:13 +0200
> Lukasz Stelmach said:
Lukasz>> Well i *have*got* one v4ADDR that is assigned to my nat/router-box. I
[...]
Lukasz>> harm. Let's say taht to the rest of the world the nat+TIGGER act like
Lukasz>> a single m
Hi,
I thought this might be of interest to some of you
even though I am sure many of you already know about this
http://www.liberouter.org/
Would be good to have standard support within FreeBSD tree
for these :)
--
===
Chris
==
Hi,
> On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:07:34 +0200
> Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lukasz> In one of my previous letters I have mentioned that i use 4.9-RCsomething
Lukasz> and unfortunately this is my only FreeBSD. I am also afraid :-( that
Lukasz> i don't have enough spare time neithe
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 07:30:30PM +0200, Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> I thought this might be of interest to some of you
> even though I am sure many of you already know about this
>
> http://www.liberouter.org/
>
> Would be good to have standard support within FreeBSD tree
> for these :)
This
11 matches
Mail list logo
