Re: do we support non contiguous netmasks ?

2004-04-07 Thread Tony Finch
Anders Lowinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> >> i was wondering if anyone knows what kind of support we have >> in FreeBSD networking code, for non contiguous netmasks. >> While it is trivial to support them for interface addresses, >> managing them in the routing table is prob

Re: sk ethernet driver: watchdog timeout

2004-04-07 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, Palle Girgensohn wrote: --On onsdag, mars 17, 2004 00.21.44 +0100 "Arno J. Klaassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I have an ASUS motherboard A7V8X-E Deluxe with onboard 10/100/1000 Mbit/s NIC from Marvell Semiconductor. My problem is that it sometimes lock up with the error message

here is the src

2004-04-07 Thread Richard Neese
ok here is the src for the driver from netbsd. I gatered it all up ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: sk ethernet driver: watchdog timeout

2004-04-07 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > --On onsdag, mars 17, 2004 00.21.44 +0100 "Arno J. Klaassen" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > >> I have an ASUS motherboard A7V8X-E Deluxe with onboard 10/100/1000 > >> Mbit/s NIC from Marvell Semiconductor. > >> > >> My problem is that

arp entries for local interfaces disappearing ?

2004-04-07 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Can someone explain why, in my arp table, i don't have an entry for my local machine ? I just noticed this by chance, on my 4.9 box at the office, and now again at home: > ifconfig rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 10.0.1.55 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 inet

Re: arp entries for local interfaces disappearing ?

2004-04-07 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:57:48AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Can someone explain why, in my arp table, i don't have an > entry for my local machine ? I just noticed this by chance, > on my 4.9 box at the office, and now again at home: > > > ifconfig > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >

Re: arp entries for local interfaces disappearing ?

2004-04-07 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:38:43PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: ... > > ? (10.0.1.52) at 00:02:2d:08:a3:3b on rl0 [ethernet] > > ? (10.0.1.55) at 00:40:f4:34:b1:4b on rl0 permanent [ethernet] > > ? (10.0.1.64) at 52:54:05:de:99:7c on rl0 [ethernet] > > > > and it's marked permanent, so

Re: arp entries for local interfaces disappearing ?

2004-04-07 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:50:53AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:38:43PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > ... > > > ? (10.0.1.52) at 00:02:2d:08:a3:3b on rl0 [ethernet] > > > ? (10.0.1.55) at 00:40:f4:34:b1:4b on rl0 permanent [ethernet] > > > ? (10.0.1.64) at 52:

Re: arp entries for local interfaces disappearing ?

2004-04-07 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:57:48 -0700 Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can someone explain why, in my arp table, i don't have an > entry for my local machine ? I just noticed this by chance, > on my 4.9 box at the office, and now again at home: > > > ifconfig > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 150

Re: arp entries for local interfaces disappearing ?

2004-04-07 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:57:48 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >Can someone explain why, in my arp table, i don't have an >entry for my local machine ? I just noticed this by chance, >on my 4.9 box at the office, and now again at home: I think this is a fairly old thing as I noticed th

Stupid question about managed switches

2004-04-07 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Please excuse this, but my experience with them is zilch ... am going with the HP Procurve 2826(?) Layer2/Layer3 switch, as was suggested, but I'm curious as to how they work ... For instance, I know when I setup a router, I have an IN IP and an OUT IP configured ... but, with a managed switch, w

Re: Stupid question about managed switches

2004-04-07 Thread Vlad GALU
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |Please excuse this, but my experience with them is zilch ... am going |with the HP Procurve 2826(?) Layer2/Layer3 switch, as was suggested, |but I'm curious as to how they work ... | |For instance, I know when I setup a router, I have an IN IP and

RE: Stupid question about managed switches

2004-04-07 Thread Don Bowman
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Please excuse this, but my experience with them is zilch ... > am going with > the HP Procurve 2826(?) Layer2/Layer3 switch, as was > suggested, but I'm > curious as to how they work ... > > For instance, I know when I setup a router, I have