I have installed BIND 9 now, and everything works like a charm.
Presumably BIND 8 simply doesn't handle lookups correctly.
Crist J. Clark wrote:
It looks like "fw" is messed up. Those responses don't carry any
authority records. The queries for the root servers are returning "no
error" with
[moving to -net from -stable]
Andrey Alekseyev wrote:
>
> > If you'd like, try this patch (it may help for NFSv3 and certain
> > usage patterns)
> > http://blackflag.ru/patches/open-retry-stale.diff
>
> In addition you may also try this one:
> http://blackflag.ru/patches/nfs_subs.c.diff
>
> In
I've applied both patches (and defined Z_NFS_EXTENSIONS).
It does not help. How do I handle it?
Did you set open_retry_stale sysctl to 1?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mai
Andrey Alekseyev wrote:
>
> > I've applied both patches (and defined Z_NFS_EXTENSIONS).
> > It does not help. How do I handle it?
>
> Did you set open_retry_stale sysctl to 1?
Ops, mea culpa. I'll try.
Eugene
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://
Hi folks,
Is There a way to configure MRTG no SNMP?
Thanks and Regards.
Eicke.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Gang,
I've been wading through several network drivers recently,
learning Bill Paul's code. Specifically, I examined the
following drivers: ste(4), rl(4), dc(4), nge(4), and vr(4).
They all use the consumer/producer approach for handling TX.
if_start() works with the producer, and txeof() works
> Gang,
>
> I've been wading through several network drivers recently,
> learning Bill Paul's code. Specifically, I examined the
> following drivers: ste(4), rl(4), dc(4), nge(4), and vr(4).
>
> They all use the consumer/producer approach for handling TX.
> if_start() works with the producer, an
Yes, you are correct. I had mistyped a route and was trying to add
192.168.40.0/2 instead of 192.168.40.0/24.
Thanks for your help. I think I had looked at that long enough that I
would have never found the problem.
Jay
Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
Hi,
it looks everything is ok, until your
Hello,
This thread has been very helpful. I'm using FreeBSD
5.2.1 REL with kernels recompiled to support IPSEC.
I've found the "trick" to exclude port 500 UDP packets
allows ISAKMP traffic to be exchanged, e.g:
spdadd 192.168.20.1[500] 192.168.21.1[500] udp -P out
none;
spdadd 192.168.21.1[500]
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 09:03:02AM -0800, Bill Paul wrote:
[...]
> > To differentiate the case of an empty
> > ring from the full ring, some drivers (ste(4), dc(4), and
> > nge(4)) have the threshold (6 for dc(4), 3 for ste(4), and
> > 2 for nge(4)) to assert the gap between producer and consumer,
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:47:33PM -0300, Eicke Felipe wrote:
> Is There a way to configure MRTG no SNMP?
Yes. Just read its documentation. And this question isn't for this list.
Eugene
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:47:33PM -0300, Eicke Felipe wrote:
Is There a way to configure MRTG no SNMP?
Yes. Just read its documentation. And this question isn't for this list.
I disagree a bit, as this can be quite an interesting topic
You can use ipfw counters and wr
12 matches
Mail list logo
