On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 12:26:51PM -0500, James wrote:
J> >that was my thought initially, BUT.. actually... you can
J> >actually do this no problem using mrtd dumps and pick it up with a
J> >program via bgp device :P no need to create another api it seems :)
J>
J> errr??? I meant bpf d
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 12:26:51PM -0500, James wrote:
> J> >that was my thought initially, BUT.. actually... you can
> J> >actually do this no problem using mrtd dumps and pick it up with a
> J> >program via bgp device :P no need to create another api it seems
Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > there are still other things freebsd lacks. such as uRPF that
> > _SERVICE_PROVIDER_
> > can use. ipfw2 has verrevpath but all it does from what i know is strict
> > uRPF
> > only. service providers like myself, if we were to use freebsd boxen
The sender side patch for fixing Sbuf/Mbuf can be found at:
http://dsd.lbl.gov/~jin/network/lion/patches/smbuf.patch.tbz
Patch is for both 4.x and 5.2.x. To apply patch:
bzip2 -d < smbuf.patch.tbz | tar -xf -
cd net-lion
./restore-src backup# backup files will be modified to ???.org
"Jin Guojun [DSD]" wrote:
>
> The sender side patch for fixing Sbuf/Mbuf can be found at:
>
> http://dsd.lbl.gov/~jin/network/lion/patches/smbuf.patch.tbz
>
> Patch is for both 4.x and 5.2.x. To apply patch:
...
> For more information about this patch, please refer to:
>
> http://dsd.lb
The patch for reducing time traversing queues is good..
I have some questions..
It look sas if you have alos included some parts of files and patches
that are for other netLION changes.. what is the status of the other
changes.. In particular, the comments mention SACK. Are you developing a
robis
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> "Jin Guojun [DSD]" wrote:
> >
> > The sender side patch for fixing Sbuf/Mbuf can be found at:
> >
> > http://dsd.lbl.gov/~jin/network/lion/patches/smbuf.patch.tbz
> >
> > Patch is for both 4.x and 5.2.x. To apply patch:
> ...
> > For more information about this patch,
The Network LION (aka LION, Net-Lion) is a totally different network architecture
that
we proposed to replace TCP/IP. It has compatibility to TCP/IP for current stage.
Backward compatibility is important to it can be deployed without forcing every
one
do at the same time, which is impossible to do.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE
Someone (hopefully you) has recently requested that all mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be forwarded to this address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
If you wish to authorize this, please click on the link below, or copy and paste it
into your web browser.
http://www.hotpop.com/[
