I'm new to bluetooth. I read the handbook bluetooth chapter several time,
but I don't think I really get it:(
Okay, let me try to explain it so please you can tell me if I have some
concepture problem:
To let several other bluetooth device (notebooks) to access my LAN, that is
"LAN access for
On my test system kldload /modules/ng_netflow.ko returns: kldload: can't
load ./ng_netflow.ko: Exec format error
After this there is a message in dmesg: link_elf: symbol ng_make_node_common
undefined
# uname -a
FreeBSD inet.park7.number.ru 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: Fri Feb 6
18:44:04 MS
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir wrote:
> On my test system kldload /modules/ng_netflow.ko returns: kldload: can't
> load ./ng_netflow.ko: Exec format error
> After this there is a message in dmesg: link_elf: symbol ng_make_node_common
> undefined
do a
kldload netgraph
Thanks! Maybe this should be added to a pkg-message or README?
BlackSir
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bjoern A. Zeeb
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 5:53 PM
> To: Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EM
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Marian Durkovic wrote:
Hi all,
the performance problem seems to disappear, when the hardware checksuming
for TX direction is disabled (RX hw checksuming still on).
Here are the results:
Hm... This, combined with Matt blaming the Tx checksum for c
I´m asking the net list because I came across this when browsing through
the networking / resolver code.
The question is if the code should check for zero value before calling
malloc or is malloc(0) legal if the pointer is never used?
I came across this when using dmalloc library and it started
Petri Helenius wrote:
>
> I?m asking the net list because I came across this when browsing through
> the networking / resolver code.
>
> The question is if the code should check for zero value before calling
> malloc or is malloc(0) legal if the pointer is never used?
>
> I came across this wh
Maxime Henrion wrote:
In C99, malloc(0) is legal. From n869.txt :
%%
If the size of the space requested is zero, the behavior is
implementation-defined: either a null pointer is returned,
or the behavior is as if the size were some nonzero value,
except that the returned pointer shall not b
more likely the depednency should be registerred so that it is
done automatically.
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir wrote:
> Thanks! Maybe this should be added to a pkg-message or README?
> BlackSir
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mail
Couldnt find this card mentioned on the list, so I'm just letting you
know that this card works with 5.2.
Card details:
D-Link DWL-G520 (802.11 b/g)
h/w ver. A3
f/w ver. 2.36
pciconf:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:11:0: class=0x02 card=0x32031186 chip=0x0013168c
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
ve
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:44:27AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> more likely the depednency should be registerred so that it is
J> done automatically.
Is it possible to make port dependant on kernel module
shipped with base system? How?
For example sysutils/ips is not dependant on ipfw. It is o
11 matches
Mail list logo