Is anybody hiding any patches for this somewhere? If so speak now... :-)
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Is anybody hiding any patches for this somewhere? If so speak now... :-)
I have on NetBSD tree, though it doesn't support MPI350 yet.
Atsushi Onoe
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:22:10PM +0900, Atsushi Onoe wrote:
> > Is anybody hiding any patches for this somewhere? If so speak now... :-)
>
> I have on NetBSD tree, though it doesn't support MPI350 yet.
Excellent. I'll have a look. Using ieee802_11* seems to make using radiotap
easier...
BMS
__
Hi,
I have added some functionality to ng_ether / ng_pppoe that is needed
for running multiple pppoe sessions over one single NIC even if
the AC uses s.th. like 'pppoe duplicate-protection' [1].
I have seperated the patches for easier review and tried to do it in
a manner so that parts can be use
Dear all,
I have just finished a netgraph node which enables the formation of multihop ad
hoc networks. It routes data packets according to their hardware addresses
using a link state algorithm, namely GSR.
The source tarball can be obtained at:
http://newton.ee.auth.gr/ng_daphne/ng_daphne-1.0
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
I have added some functionality to ng_ether / ng_pppoe that is needed
for running multiple pppoe sessions over one single NIC even if
the AC uses s.th. like 'pppoe duplicate-protection' [1].
I have seperated the patches for easier review and tried to do it in
a manner so
Greetings,
I am trying to get FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC running on an HP xw4100 workstation.
This workstation has a bcm5782 (broadcom netxtreme gigabit) ethernet
interface onboard. the bge driver appears to grab the interface, and i
can configure it with ifconfig. however, i am unable to send or receiv
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi,
first thanks for your feedback.
> this comment and the code disagree
> + /* If "promisc" hook not connected, let packet continue */
> + if (priv->lower == NULL || priv->lowerType!=LOWER_TYPE_PROMISC) {
> + m_freem(m);
> +
