Hi,
I'm currently chewing on a problem how to setup DHCP
properly the way I want it.
My notebook computer (running 5.2-CURRENT) has a fxp0
and a wi0 (wavelan) interface. WaveLan ist available most
of the times.
Now, what I would like it to do is:
1. If fxp0 link is up, configure fxp0 interface,
> Has anyone come across this before, is this a bug in
> the kernel? (I assume it
> does the same thing in FreeBSD)
Not sure if this is a bug, but doing the following
shows a similar problem.
With boxes A and B as you mentioned;
Create a ppp interface manually on B using IP's like
10.1.1.1 -> 10
I'm trying to configure a FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE system to act as the default
gateway for several virtual lans. I've got two NICs in the box, one which
supplies the uplink, and one which has about 40 vlan(4) vlans on it.
I was trying to run isc-dhcp3's dhcrelay to relay DHCP messages to our DHCP
ser
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxim Konovalov writes:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, 12:07+0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Simple question:
Very simple UDP server daemon.
Many clients (connect(2)'ing a socket for each is not an option)
Multihomed machine.
What's the si
I'm having a FreeBSD router here that has many networks connected to it which
are only sparsely populated. These days I get network scans (deliberate and
worms scanning for new targets) every second or so going through every IP in
my netblocks. The router is faithfully generating ICMP host unreac
Hi,
I'm heavily working on a filtering bridge with FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE...
First I tried to configure the host (a HP DL380) with three interfaces:
fxp0 and fxp1 for bridging (without ip-addresses) and bge0 for
ssh-access with an ip-address - this does not work so far because ipfw
obviously canno
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I'm having a FreeBSD router here that has many networks connected to it which
> are only sparsely populated. These days I get network scans (deliberate and
> worms scanning for new targets) every second or so going through every IP in
> my netblocks.
Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > I'm having a FreeBSD router here that has many networks connected to it which
> > are only sparsely populated. These days I get network scans (deliberate and
> > worms scanning for new targets) every second or so going
[Yes, this is an old issue, but I have been biten by it today, googled a
bit, and here's a dirty fix]
Alex Hayward wrote on Sun Nov 30 03:20:24 2003:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > I am having some problems with racoon(8). Everything works fine for
> > the lifetime of the initial
I have looked at the FAQ, the handbook, The Complete FreeBSD, and haven't
found anything like what I'm looking for.
There seems to be 2-3 implementations of access control lists and
2-3 implementations of network address translation that apply to
FreeBSD.
Is there anywhere that discusses the rela
Andrea/all:
An interesting question... the following link has
some thoughts along these lines... and something
for the BSD community to think upon...
http://www.sctp.org/what_is_alt_route
TCP could definetly use something like the above (with Itojun's Multi-path
updates as well).. it would give m
Hi everybody,
I'm going to be trying to get gigabit throughput between my laptop (Dell
Latitude D800 running 5.2-release) and a shuttle box running FreeBSD 5.1
(not in front of me at the moment.) As part of the process, I attempted
to increase the frame size on my laptop, only to be greeted with
Mike Hunter wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm going to be trying to get gigabit throughput between my laptop (Dell
> Latitude D800 running 5.2-release) and a shuttle box running FreeBSD 5.1
> (not in front of me at the moment.) As part of the process, I attempted
> to increase the frame size on m
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:12:06PM -0800, Mike Hunter wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm going to be trying to get gigabit throughput between my laptop (Dell
> Latitude D800 running 5.2-release) and a shuttle box running FreeBSD 5.1
> (not in front of me at the moment.) As part of the process, I att
Mike Hunter wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm going to be trying to get gigabit throughput between my laptop (Dell
Latitude D800 running 5.2-release) and a shuttle box running FreeBSD 5.1
(not in front of me at the moment.) As part of the process, I attempted
to increase the frame size on my laptop, onl
> "Mike" == Mike Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> Hi everybody, I'm going to be trying to get gigabit throughput
Mike> between my laptop (Dell Latitude D800 running 5.2-release) and a
Mike> shuttle box running FreeBSD 5.1 (not in front of me at the
Mike> moment.) As part of the proces
> "Eric" == Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> As a data point, my BCM5702 (Dell D600) works fine: # ifconfig
Eric> -a bge0: flags=8843 mtu
Eric> 9000 options=1b inet6
Eric> fe80::20b:dbff:fea3:f9a1%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet
Eric> 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.
> "Andre" == Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Hmm... works for me (on my shiny new dual-Opteron):
Andre> Mine is a 5704C dual GigE chip.
Yeah... the D800 has a 5705M chip ... which doesn't support jumbo
frames... which is some deliberate bit of marketing goo, I suspect.
Da
David Gilbert wrote:
"Eric" == Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> As a data point, my BCM5702 (Dell D600) works fine: # ifconfig
Eric> -a bge0: flags=8843 mtu
Eric> 9000 options=1b inet6
Eric> fe80::20b:dbff:fea3:f9a1%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet
Eric> 0.0.0.0 netma
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 08:21:50PM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote:
> bge0: mem
> 0xfaff-0xfaff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci2
> bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0b:db:a3:f9:a1
> miibus0: on bge0
> brgphy0: on miibus0
> brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX,
> 1000bas
> "Eric" == Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> bge0: mem
Eric> 0xfaff-0xfaff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci2 bge0:
Eric> Ethernet address: 00:0b:db:a3:f9:a1 miibus0: on bge0
Eric> brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0:
Eric> 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX
On Jan 22, "Brooks Davis" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:12:06PM -0800, Mike Hunter wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to be trying to get gigabit throughput between my laptop (Dell
> > Latitude D800 running 5.2-release) and a shuttle box running FreeBSD 5.1
> > (not in front of me at the moment.) A
22 matches
Mail list logo
