- Original Message -
From: "CHOI Junho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD -> Windows HTTP TCP performance
>
> After more investigation, I realized the problem is on the router
> side. I think th
Those messages sometimes appears in log. Maybe someone know where to find
what it actually mean?
Jan 21 02:58:54 inet /kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway value
Jan 21 03:03:54 inet /kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway value
Jan 21 03:08:53 inet /kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway value
Jan 21 03:13
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:11:48PM -0800, Andrew Thomas wrote:
A> > A> I'm trying to get mpd working as a simple vpn server. I'm doing
A> > A> this on a 4.9-STABLE machine of a week or so ago. No matter what
A> > A> I do, packets will not route to the client. The login is fine,
A> > A> the serve
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Richard Wendland wrote:
> This does suggest Ken is seeing TSecr messed up in some other way than
> simple zeroing.
Or working from an old codebase... we'll have to wait for him to respond
to find out. KEN! KEN! WHERE ARE YOO?
> I'd expect this to be a pretty rare eve
Hi,
Using bpf with ng_eiface results in duplication of all incoming packets.
The duplicated packet is only "visible" on the bpf tap and the ngeth
interface works as expected besides this behaviour with bpf.
The following examplifies the problem: (pasted from my memory)
ngctl -f- <
tcpdump-n -i
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Dinesh Nair wrote:
> will do. i'm on 4.9-STABLE. will try the following in this order:
>
> 1. the multipath patches
> 2. security/pf port
> 3. rewriting ng_ether to plonk in the new ip address directly into the
>mbuf. along with ng_one2many, this should provide the same
>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:11:21AM +0100, Jonas Bulow wrote:
> Using bpf with ng_eiface results in duplication of all incoming packets.
> The duplicated packet is only "visible" on the bpf tap and the ngeth
> interface works as expected besides this behaviour with bpf.
[...]
>
> This problem occ
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:51:18AM +0300, Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir wrote:
> Those messages sometimes appears in log. Maybe someone know where to find
> what it actually mean?
>
> Jan 21 02:58:54 inet /kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway value
> Jan 21 03:03:54 inet /kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad
Does the behavior described in
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2003-October/001726.html apply to
Solaris 8 systems? Also, can you tell me what the difference is between binding
IPADDR_ANY, a local network ip address or multicast ip address to the socket and
should you use the sam
Dinesh Nair wrote:
while this multipath patch does round robin the packets (according to
pathmetric) across the two gateways, it does not change the source ip
address of the packet to correspond with the interface it went out on.
as such, the round robin works this way. the first 10 packets are se
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Adrian Pavlykevych wrote:
> Hmm, have you accounted for the fact, that if packets of same connection
> will be distributed in round-robin fashion between several outgoing
> interfaces and get their src IP "fixed", destination host won't see that
> as single connection and dro
Tuesday, January 20, 2004, 9:51:52 PM, you wrote:
DN> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>> Isn't ng_etf(4) the one you need?
DN> ng_etf does filtering, i'm planning on doing round robin IP tranmission,
DN> with source IP address set accordingly. see ng_one2many which gives an
DN> exampl
Hi,
I've tried a NetBSD mailing list to no avail and was hoping that someone here
could help me.
I have the following setup:
A - B == C
Box A and Box B are on a LAN both on the same subnet. Now from box B I make a
pppd modem dialup to box C. Manual routes are setup on A and C to allow
it is on 4.7 since that is what our product is using
but the same code still exists in 5.2 (we're actively
migrating our product there)
We definitely are seeing incorrect Tsecr returned (ie not 0,
but tsecr > ticks, thus the -ve result)
The question was more that it could be a problem in general
Hi, All
I'm trying to let my FreeBSD 4.9 box, working as bridge, divert and fwd
bridged packets. As i undestand it is not realized in FreeBSD 4.9. I
was thinking about to do it (realize), but im too lazy and when i see
this huge amount of work i start thinking :)
Befor i continue my work i just w
Hello,
My sincerest apologies if this isn't the correct list to post this
question to, but I was wondering if anyone has any guidelines/procedures
to follow regarding the correct installation method for PF on FreeBSD
5.2-RELEASE. I know of its existence in ports/security, but was
wondering if the
from pkg-message which lives in /usr/ports/security/pf/
To use pf, please follow these steps:
1. Add kernel options into your kernel config file and recompile kernel:
device bpf
options PFIL_HOOKS
options RANDOM_IP_ID
2. Please set the following variables in /etc/rc.con
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
> 1 let default route be to fxp0
> 2 conncet fxp0's upper hook to "one" hook of ng_one2many
> 3 connect lower hooks of fxp0 and aue0 to "many" hooks of ng_one2many
> 4 u have what u r accept for the overwriting src ip
> 5 time for uber hack ng_one2many:
Yes, indeed, many thanks for the quick response. I had read through the
makefile, but wasn't sure if there were any additional settings that I
should take into consideration. On that note, does anyone have any
experience running PF under 5.2-RELEASE in a production environment,
especially in conj
Hello:
Is there anything for FreeBSD that's analogous to Linux's
"mii-diag" program? I'm (still) trying to troubleshoot
a card's (mis)communication with a router.
For background, see
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401120237.VAA15119655
Thanks,
-kc
__
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 16:58, Art Mason wrote:
> Yes, indeed, many thanks for the quick response. I had read through
> the makefile, but wasn't sure if there were any additional settings
> that I should take into consideration. On that note, does anyone have
> any experience running PF unde
Andre Oppermann writes:
>
> Could you run some bechmarks with the current MCLBYTES rounding
> and without it on 100Mbit 1.5kMTU and GigE with 9k MTU?
David Borman is totally right. Clipping the mss is really worth it,
especially with zero-copy sockets. Forget I said anything.
Here is som
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Andrew Riabtsev wrote:
> And now befor send out packet throw one of "many" hook just overwrite
> ip-src address with address given in
> node->private->enabledLinks[hook->private->numb] or whatever it is
> called in ng_one2many.c
you'd also need to overwrite the destination e
I'm reviewing uses of sdl->sdl_data so see if I can make a minor change
to the way that data is stored and I noticed what I think is a bug in
the userland ppp implementation. It looks like it's trying to print the
interface name from the sdl, but the precision specifier is wrong. A
simpiler print
Yep, that's a bug... feel free to apply the patch.
Cheers.
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:01:52 -0800, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm reviewing uses of sdl->sdl_data so see if I can make a minor change
> to the way that data is stored and I noticed what I think is a bug in
> the userland p
25 matches
Mail list logo
