On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, 06:33+0100, Bjorn Eikeland wrote:
> P? Tue, 6 Jan 2004 07:41:26 +0300 (MSK), skrev Maxim Konovalov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Try sysctl net.inet.ip.check_interface=0.
> >
>
> Well that did the trick!
>Thank you very much!
We really have to document that knob somewhere i
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Also sprach Markus Oestreicher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Is there a way to get the real processor usage including
> > the time spent on polling?
1. No.
2. Use kernel profiling (preferably high resolution kernel profiling).
Measurement will affect
I have a relatively loaded router with permanent
load of ~ 200Kb/s. Its system time is a bit slowed down:
Jan 6 10:45:30 gw-f ntpd[274]: time reset 4.212716 s
Jan 6 11:00:52 gw-f ntpd[274]: time reset 3.682535 s
Jan 6 11:15:50 gw-f ntpd[274]: time reset 2.881445 s
Jan 6 11:32:42 gw-f nt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > To answer your question; the Intel Etherexpress Pro/100 as it is
> > supported by the fxp driver accepts and sends the 4-byte VLAN enhanced
> > ethernet frames.
>
> Do you know does dc driver accepts and sends the 4-byte VLAN enhanced
> ethernet frames?
The dc driv
The problem
I have 5 buildings that are connected via point-to-point wireless. The
cost of dedicated lines within this town were so high that wireless was an
excellent option. The wireless is in place and working however we are
going back to secure the wireless cloud so that it cannot be used by
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:20:25PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem
> I have 5 buildings that are connected via point-to-point wireless. The
> cost of dedicated lines within this town were so high that wireless was an
> excellent option. The wireless is in place and working however w
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:03:31PM -0500, Barney Wolff wrote:
> I'd suspect MTU issues rather than multiple A records. Try setting the
> MTU of the link to the Internet to 1400. If that works you can fine
> tune it.
i mailed the original author privately, but for the archive this is the
most lik
Hi,
I'm trying to use netgraph and kqueue together and ran into some
problems. I hope someone can enligthen me what I'm missing.
I register EVFILT_READ and EVFILT_WRITE on a netgraph-socket connected
to a netgraph echo-node. The EVFILT_WRITE-filter returns immediately
from the kevent call sayi
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Jonas Bulow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use netgraph and kqueue together and ran into some
> problems. I hope someone can enligthen me what I'm missing.
I'm not sure that anyone has ever looked at netgraph and kqueue as a
pair.
>
> I register EVFILT_READ and EVFILT_
