On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:29:07AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:17:06AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > the fxp has a problem which does not allow it to go above 103/110/120kpps
> > depending on which descriptor model you use, no matter how fast
> > the CPU is.
>
> C
On Saturday 13 December 2003 18:47, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Please try an enclosed patch or put a whitespace right after the '('
> before '\'.
>
> Index: ipfw2.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c,v
> retrieving revisi
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, 12:23-, Nate Grey wrote:
> On Saturday 13 December 2003 18:47, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > Please try an enclosed patch or put a whitespace right after the '('
> > before '\'.
> >
> > Index: ipfw2.c
> > ===
> >
On Dec 12, 2003, at 7:19 PM, Barney Wolff wrote:
I have a real philosophical problem with ceding ports to worms, viruses
and trojans. Where will it stop? Portno is a finite resource.
This is a respectable position, but the notion of categorizing ranges
of ports into an association with a securit
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 02:41:00PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2003, at 7:19 PM, Barney Wolff wrote:
> >I have a real philosophical problem with ceding ports to worms, viruses
> >and trojans. Where will it stop? Portno is a finite resource.
>
> This is a respectable position, but t
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:29:07AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> 100*1024*1024/8/1500=8738.1(3)
SI in bits across a network is base 10, not 2 (1000 vs 1024).
--
Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:01 pm, Willie Viljoen wrote:
> > >from home you double tunnel:
> > >LOCALPORT=6333
> > >REMOTEPORT=5901
> > >ssh -t -L $LOCALPORT:localhost:12945 work1 \
> > >ssh -L 12945:localhost:$REMOTEPORT work2
> >
> > As home is a W2k box, ssh won't probably work exactly like this.
All this talk of tcpdump, etc. has made me remember a question I thought of a
while back and never got a decent answer on...
What tools are there in BSD-land that are usefull for monitoring activity on
an AP? i.e. like dstumbler but from the LAN side? well, alright, not like
dstumbler as it has
most APs have snmp
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
