On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:06:19AM -0500, Clark Gaylord wrote:
> >Is it possible to saturate 100Mbit ethernet using FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE,
> >Pentium-133 & Intel 430VX-based motherboard (PCI-33),
> >Intel 82559 Pro/100 Ethernet (fxp) ?
> >I tried to use sendfile(2) on /dev/zero but that does not wor
>> dd if=holey-file of=/dev/null bs=10m
>
> I've got about 30% of CPU load for the server (P-133) and less than
> 35mbit/s on wire.
Also you can try to dump traffic with tcpdump and send it with
/usr/ports/net/tcpreplay
I'm trying to send 100Mbit/s for 5-6 minutes with Ethernet frame size at
6
Hello,
on 5.2-RC I get this error from ipfw:
ipfw in free(): error: modified (chunk -) pointer
Aboirt trap (core dumped)
examining my firewall script I noticed that error occurs when ipfw try to
load this rules
fwcmd="/sbin/ipfw -q/"
${fwcmd} add 310 set 1 deny ip from $bad_guys to any in rec
From: DrumFire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> dd if=holey-file of=/dev/null bs=10m
> >
> > I've got about 30% of CPU load for the server (P-133) and less than
> > 35mbit/s on wire.
>
> Also you can try to dump traffic with tcpdump and send it with
>
> /usr/ports/net/tcpreplay
>
> I'm trying
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:50:33AM -0500, Don Bowman wrote:
...
> There is a netgraph module called ng_source which can do this.
> It can achieve about 400Kpps or >1Gbps on a xeon system with
> a gigabit card, should be able to saturate a fxp.
the fxp has a problem which does not allow it to go ab
[ CC: Luigi ]
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, 11:49-, Nate Grey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 5.2-RC I get this error from ipfw:
>
> ipfw in free(): error: modified (chunk -) pointer
> Aboirt trap (core dumped)
>
> examining my firewall script I noticed that error occurs when ipfw try to
> load this rules
>
Hi freebsd-net@ folk.
I've been having problems trying to simultaneously configure my 4.9
home client gateway & my remote 24/7 server to provide an Auth +
SASL outgoing sendmail channel. My fault not FreeBSD's but I'm
asking for help. One problem is I dont have a known good server
or client to te
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:17:06AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> the fxp has a problem which does not allow it to go above 103/110/120kpps
> depending on which descriptor model you use, no matter how fast
> the CPU is.
Can you explain the problem, please?
> Even not using any special kernel module
