Re: Static route via address, not interface

2003-11-17 Thread Vladimir B. Grebenschikov
В пт, 14.11.2003, в 20:41, Jason Dixon пишет: > On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 07:38, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > > > I guess - you already have 192.168.0.0/24 route entry, added by command: > > ifconfig fxp0 192.168.0.53/24 > > > > so now you need: > > remove network route via interface: > > rout

Path MTU growth in TCP?

2003-11-17 Thread George V. Neville-Neil
Howdy, I was wondering if PMTU ever tries to grow the MTU of a connection after a time? I.e. if the path changes it might change away from one where the MTU was particularly small. Thanks, George ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing li

Re: Path MTU growth in TCP?

2003-11-17 Thread Andre Oppermann
"George V. Neville-Neil" wrote: > > Howdy, > > I was wondering if PMTU ever tries to grow the MTU of a > connection after a time? I.e. if the path changes it might > change away from one where the MTU was particularly small. It doesn't try to that in the strict sense. I

Problem with Racoon/IPSec/Setkey - Routing to/from multiple networks

2003-11-17 Thread Jamie Heckford
Hi, Seem to be having a strange problem routing to some of our nets over here using setkey and racoon. Setkey adds all of the below lines fine, and racoon doesn't complain. However, I can only route to the network that I initate the connection to/from first... For example: If I ping 192.168.100.

Knowing a route multiply.

2003-11-17 Thread David Gilbert
We have a problem. We have more than one router routing for a subnet. We use Quaaga (zebra's follow-on) and OSPF to keep everything in sync. And everything is fine if all the interfaces are configured at boot time (before quaaga starts up). The problem occurs if you want to add a routed network

Re: Problem with Racoon/IPSec/Setkey - Routing to/from multiple netwo rks

2003-11-17 Thread Helge Oldach
Jamie Heckford: >/usr/sbin/setkey -c << EOF >flush; >spdflush; >spdadd ${LOCAL_NETWORK} ${STJUST_NETWORK} any -P out ipsec >esp/tunnel/${LOCAL_OUTSIDE}-${STJUST_OUTSIDE}/require; >spdadd ${STJUST_NETWORK} ${LOCAL_NETWORK} any -P in ipsec >esp/tunnel/${STJUST_OUTSIDE}-${LOCAL_OUTSIDE}/require; >spd

Re: ip-up script of pppd no triggered

2003-11-17 Thread Jim Xochellis
Hi Maxim, On Saturday, November 15, 2003, at 11:02 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, 22:44+0200, Jim Xochellis wrote: > >> Hi Maxim, >> >> On Friday, November 14, 2003, at 09:13 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, 16:02+0200, Jim Xochellis wrote: >>> Hi lis

Current problem reports assigned to you

2003-11-17 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2002/05/04] kern/37761 net process exits but socket is still ESTAB

named problem (introduced in 5.1)

2003-11-17 Thread Aleksander Rozman - Andy
Hi ! I have been running named for few years now, and I never had any problem with it. Few days ago I upgraded system to 5.1 (Release) and named has gone beserk. It shows errors in named.root file. Error go something like this: check_hints: no A record for address 'Something' class 1 in hints

Re: named problem (introduced in 5.1)

2003-11-17 Thread Jason
Aleksander Rozman - Andy wrote: Hi ! I have been running named for few years now, and I never had any problem with it. Few days ago I upgraded system to 5.1 (Release) and named has gone beserk. It shows errors in named.root file. Error go something like this: check_hints: no A record for addre