Hello,
I'm facing a problem with the following setup :
+-+ DMZ ++ LAN +--+
Internet -+ Tunnel Endpoint +-+ Fw +-+ Host |
+-+ ++ +--+
"Tunnel Endpoint" : FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE with fast
Eric Masson wrote:
If i reduce lan interface mtu on "Host" to approximately 1450, the
tunnel works fine, so it seems that "Tunnel Endpoint" can't process
correctly packets with a size of 1500 bytes.
You should allow for an IP header with options and the ESP header,
which is smaller than 1450. Fo
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 02:10:14AM +0100, Dan wrote:
> Hello there.
> Odd query for you.
>
> My setup is that sis0 is the ethernet which has the business cable modem
> attached to it - which serves as a gateway. sis1 is the Ethernet which my
> laptop connects to (wirelessly through a HE501 wirel
I'm experiencing 2-3% packet loss in a bridging configuration on a FreeBSD
4.8-p13 box, Intel Celeron 700MHz with 256MB RAM, dual fxp NICs (it's a
Dell Poweredge 350). I'm running ipfw2 rules on the bridge, but have
ruled them out as the cause of the loss by clearing them out - the loss
still occu
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Tim Wilde wrote:
> I'm experiencing 2-3% packet loss in a bridging configuration on a FreeBSD
> 4.8-p13 box, Intel Celeron 700MHz with 256MB RAM, dual fxp NICs (it's a
> Dell Poweredge 350).
Okay, ignore this - my switch was being stupid. Locked on both ends,
packet loss. A
Hi there.
Thank you for your reply!
This is all very confusing, hehe!
I'm not running a DNS server, the laptop which access through NAT I've set the
nameservers as those of my ISP (and those listed in /etc/resolv.conf) of the FreeBSD
box.
Is there anything to particulary think should not be the
