Re: Recovery from mbuf cluster exhaustion

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:10:47PM +0200, Peter Bozarov wrote: > (First off, I hope I'm posting to the right list.) -net would be more appropriate. [Redirected from -hackers] > I have the following question regarding mbuf cluster exhaustion. > If I've managed to exhaust the pool, I start getting

Re: Recovery from mbuf cluster exhaustion

Bruce M Simpson wrote: On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:10:47PM +0200, Peter Bozarov wrote: (First off, I hope I'm posting to the right list.) -net would be more appropriate. [Redirected from -hackers] I have the following question regarding mbuf cluster exhaustion. If I've managed to exhaust the po

mpd, MS-vpn and growing confusion.

Hi, I have installed mpd-3.14 on FreeBSD petra.cornelius 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #4: Sun Aug 3 12:08:09 GMT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PETRA i386 This is not the first time that I fiddle with ppp, so I thought that this would be easy. Not this time, as it seem

Re: Recovery from mbuf cluster exhaustion

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:22:34PM +0200, Peter Bozarov wrote: > I'm using 4.7. I have three interfaces, rl0, xl0, and xl1. Support for 4.7 is very limited as we transition to 4.9, please be prepared to upgrade the box. Bear in mind we commit fixes for problems to HEAD first except in those cases

Re: mpd, MS-vpn and growing confusion.

Hi, On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Peter Cornelius wrote: > Hi, > > set bundle enable compression > set ccp yes mppc > set ccp yes mpp-e40 > set ccp yes mpp-e56 > set ccp yes mpp-e128 > set bundle enable crypt-reqd > set ccp yes mpp-stateless > set ccp yes mpp-

Re: Recovery from mbuf cluster exhaustion

Bruce M Simpson wrote: Support for 4.7 is very limited as we transition to 4.9, please be prepared to upgrade the box. Bear in mind we commit fixes for problems to HEAD first except in those cases where RELENG_4 is more appropriate. I wonder if it has to do with the version I use. Let's hope so, s

Re: mpd, MS-vpn and growing confusion.

Hi Michael, > > set ccp yes stac > ^^^ ^^^ ^^ > > please remove this line. This line makes no difference to the behaviour. All there is is the error message that there is no stac when mpd starts, or not if removed. Thanks a lot, Peter. -- NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Foto

Re: mpd, MS-vpn and growing confusion.

Hi, On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Peter Cornelius wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > > set ccp yes stac > > ^^^ ^^^ ^^ > > > > please remove this line. > > This line makes no difference to the behaviour. All there is is the error > message that there is no stac when mpd starts, or not if removed. do you a

Re: mpd, MS-vpn and growing confusion.

Hi, > > > > set ccp yes stac > > > ^^^ ^^^ ^^ > > > > > > please remove this line. > > > > This line makes no difference to the behaviour. All there is is the > error > > message that there is no stac when mpd starts, or not if removed. > do you also have? > set ccp yes

routed(8) and static routes

I'm trying for the first time to get routed(8) to do something useful, and it's got me stumped. The man page says: Static routes in the kernel table are preserved and included in RIP responses if they have a valid RIP metric (see route(8)). >From reading the sources, "valid RIP metric" seems

Re: routed(8) and static routes

John Polstra wrote: > I'm trying for the first time to get routed(8) to do something useful, > and it's got me stumped. The man page says: > > Static routes in the kernel table are preserved and included in RIP > responses if they have a valid RIP metric (see route(8)). > > >From reading th