Re: adding if_dev member to struct ifnet

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Brooks Davis wrote: BD>On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: BD>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Brooks Davis wrote: BD>> BD>> BD>All are within other code. One example is in dev/mii/brgphy.c which a BD>> BD>phy feature is not enabled when it is attached to some

Re: ADSL PPoA or RFC1483, any solutions ?

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote: BMS>On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:17:59PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote: BMS>> Are you talking about running the phone line directly to the fbsd box BMS>> with no dsl modem? BMS> BMS>Yes. Also, PPPoA in FreeBSD is currently only implemented if you use ngatm, BMS

Re: ADSL PPoA or RFC1483, any solutions ?

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote: BMS>On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:55:28AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: BMS>> 1) Any viable solution with FreeBSD for doing that kinds (PPPoA or RFC BMS>> 1483) of encapsulation. BMS> BMS>Using xDSL will be difficult. There is a driver I have picked up

Re: ADSL PPoA or RFC1483, any solutions ?

Harti Brandt wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote: BMS>On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:17:59PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote: BMS>> Are you talking about running the phone line directly to the fbsd box BMS>> with no dsl modem? BMS> BMS>Yes. Also, PPPoA in FreeBSD is currently only implemented

Re: Review requested: revised patch for bin/41647

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:55:53AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > Hi, > > It should be possible to set the link layer address of an interface whilst > also setting the IP address. Here's a revised patch for ifconfig(8) to > add this functionality (against HEAD) based on the one in the PR. > > Th

Re: I would like to tcpdump and get all the packets...

Bruce M Simpson wrote: ports would seem to be an acceptable halfway house, though, for people who want to use pcap/tcpdump of a more recent vintage, than has been determined to be suitable for a FreeBSD release. does it not? On general case, I agree with you. However libpcap does not change tha

Re: ADSL PPoA or RFC1483, any solutions ?

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Petri Helenius wrote: PH>Harti Brandt wrote: PH> PH>>On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote: PH>> PH>>BMS>On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:17:59PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote: PH>>BMS>> Are you talking about running the phone line directly to the fbsd box PH>>BMS>> with no dsl modem

IPv6 and ndp command

Hi, I'm trying to force an ethernet address to an IPv6 node, with the ndp command, but getting following message: xelfc1# ndp -s fe80::2bd:d4ff:fe77:8 00:ca:ad:04:00:00 writing to routing socket: No such process fe80::2bd:d4ff:fe77:8: No such process xelfc1# (I have no problem to read entries vi

Re: IPv6 and ndp command

Link-local addresses are ambiguous; you will have to further qualify the address by appending '%interface' onto it (e.g. fe80::2bd:d4ff:fe77:8%fxp0). Eugene Gunnar Olsson wrote: Hi, I'm trying to force an ethernet address to an IPv6 node, with the ndp command, but getting following message: x

slow speed on a winxp PC behind FreeBSD 4.8 and 5.1 firewall/gateway

I've tried both and speeds aren't amazing. I get full speed (my adsl plan is 512/128) on the FBSD box when downloading for a local FTP server. On the WinXP PC, downloading from the same FTP and speed is struggling at 30kbytes/sec (max speed in the FBSD box is 50kbytes/sec) and it sometimes goes

Re: IPv6 autoconfiguration on a multihomed site

Hello Juan, > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:42:39 +0200 > Address of Router1: 2001:720:410:100b::3 > Address of Router2: 2001:800:40:2471::4 Please confirm connectivity from Router2 to Router1 by the following command. Router2% ping6 -S 2001:720:410:100b::3 2001:800:40:2471::4 If it does no

mobileIP documentation

Can anybody point me to documentation about setting up home/foreign agents for IPv4/IPv6 mobility on FreeBSD 5? Thanks, Justin ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EM

Re: IPv6 autoconfiguration on a multihomed site

On Thursday 02 October 2003 17:04, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote: > Hello Juan, > > > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:42:39 +0200 > > > > Address of Router1: 2001:720:410:100b::3 > > Address of Router2: 2001:800:40:2471::4 > > Please confirm connectivity from Router2 to Router1 by the following > command. >

ng_ip_input use case

Hi, I read the man of ng_ip_input and the source code. However I do not understand what the use cases could be. Who is using it and what's for ? Thanks, Vincent ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net

Re: ng_ip_input use case

I have no idea what it is used for.. similar effect can be made by using the ng_iface node, but I think that they didn't want a separate interface for each packet source.. I suggest we ask brooks..(cc'd). I could imagine it somehow connected with the 300 processor FreeBSD based cluster that he is

Re: ng_ip_input use case

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:45:47PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Vincent Jardin wrote: > > > I read the man of ng_ip_input and the source code. However I do not > > understand what the use cases could be. Who is using it and what's > > for ? > > I have no idea what it is used

Re: ng_ip_input use case

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:45:47PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Vincent Jardin wrote: > > > > > I read the man of ng_ip_input and the source code. However I do not > > > understand what the use cases could be. Who is using it an

Re: ng_ip_input use case

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 04:09:50PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:45:47PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Vincent Jardin wrote: > > > > > > > I read the man of ng_ip_input and the source code.