Hi,
It should be possible to set the link layer address of an interface whilst
also setting the IP address. Here's a revised patch for ifconfig(8) to
add this functionality (against HEAD) based on the one in the PR.
There is a problem in that applying this patch modifies syntax such that
statemen
What is the right way to set the TRAFFIC CLASS field in
ipv6 packets sent from an application? I´m looking for
function similar to setsockopt IP_TOS with IPv4.
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> BD>All are within other code. One example is in dev/mii/brgphy.c which a
> BD>phy feature is not enabled when it is attached to some MACs. A messier
> BD>example is in the new ATM code wh
Hi,
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 19:26:10 +0300
> Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pete> What is the right way to set the TRAFFIC CLASS field in
pete> ipv6 packets sent from an application? I´m looking for
pete> function similar to setsockopt IP_TOS with IPv4.
TCLASS is not supported in
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:55:28AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
> 1) Any viable solution with FreeBSD for doing that kinds (PPPoA or RFC
> 1483) of encapsulation.
Using xDSL will be difficult. There is a driver I have picked up for the
Lanai chip (Efficient Networks SpeedStream 30x0 series
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:43:44AM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> >Shurely you mean tcpdump 3.7.2, which is already imported (by fenner, with
> >additional hacks)?
> I mean libpcap, which also tcpdump uses, if I´m not mistaken. Look in
> contrib/libpcap
This is coming up more often. Perhaps we sh
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:08:56PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:55:28AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
> > 1) Any viable solution with FreeBSD for doing that kinds (PPPoA or RFC
> > 1483) of encapsulation.
>
> Using xDSL will be difficult. There is a driver I ha
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
TCLASS is not supported in current FreeBSD. It will merged into
FreeBSD during next KAME merge.
Is this planned before or after 5.2?
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:17:59PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> Are you talking about running the phone line directly to the fbsd box
> with no dsl modem?
Yes. Also, PPPoA in FreeBSD is currently only implemented if you use ngatm,
because of the signalling involved. RFC 1483 framing is a simple bo
Hi,
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:24:45 +0300
> Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>TCLASS is not supported in current FreeBSD. It will merged into
>FreeBSD during next KAME merge.
pete> Is this planned before or after 5.2?
I wish to merge in time for 5.2-RELEASE.
Sincerely,
--
Haji
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
This is coming up more often. Perhaps we should consider net/libpcap-devel
and net/tcpdump-devel ports for people who wish to track CVS and/or
snapshots of these tools? This might relieve some of the pressure on Bill
to update the vendor branch so often.
How often is "so
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:45:57PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> How often is "so often"? The vendor branch is over a year old and the
> bug that seems to annoy
> most real users of bpf has been known for quite a while longer and took
> a while to get into
> the origin and now it only would nee
12 matches
Mail list logo
