I got it fixed (or atleast, as good as it can be fixed)
For future reference, here's what went wrong.
During the weekend, SAIX upgraded and repaired all Cisco equipment on their
network. During this repair, they somehow managed to break something major.
The /etc/ppp/options file on the offendin
> > You are complicating things by running both ipfw and ipf.
> > can you not do just one of them?
>
> I'm not sure. The literature I've read so far says neither firewall
> does traffic shaping AND supports active FTP in a deny-by-default
> setting. If google's to be believed, the generally acce
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:21:03AM +0200, jeremie le-hen wrote:
> Rocco Caputo wrote:
> > The combination served me well when I was using ppp(8) to drive a serial
> > modem. Now that I've switched to ADSL and PPPoE, things seem subtly
> > broken. I blame the user (myself), but I haven't found a s
I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The first one is
setup properly but the second one never gets configured.
ifconfig_fxp0="inet a.b.c.186 netmask 255.255.255.192"
ifconfig_fxp1="inet a.c.c.187 netmask 255.255.255.192"
I'm running 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Mon Jul 1
I'm trying to run freevrrpd on a server with two interfaces for redundancy.
I want them both to act as one IP in a master/slave setup. Here's the
errors I'm getting:
Jul 31 11:07:34 ns freevrrpd[207]: launching daemon in background mode
Jul 31 11:07:34 ns freevrrpd[208]: initializing threads and
Greets
> I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The
> first one is
> setup properly but the second one never gets configured.
I just went through this process myself.
The word I have is that FreeBSD cannot run two NICs on
the same subnet, which is what your included config
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+--- On Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:59,
| Bryce Edwards proclaimed:
|
| I'm trying to run freevrrpd on a server with two interfaces for
| redundancy. I want them both to act as one IP in a master/slave setup.
| Here's the errors I'm getting:
|
| Jul 31
Hi all,
I send you this patch in order that I may have your advice. I've added
a module to tcpdump to decode AODV packets as per RFC 3561.
The only extension currently understood is HELLO.
I've submitted this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I've been working with
a number of you on wi(4) related things
Hi all,
Here's some more stuff I'd like review on. I've written a simple bit of code
which just sits there listening for RTM_RESOLVE and redirects destination
cloned route using RTM_CHANGE.
I wrote this to prove we could implement in-demand routing protocols, in
userland, without any of the stupi
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:07:18AM -0600, Bob wrote:
>
> All you are missing is the fact FreeBSD cannot handle
> two NICs the same subnet. OpenBSD does, NetBSD does and Linux does.
Wrong. As already stated, make the netmask on the second one /32.
Re freevrrpd, so far as I know it's intended for
--- Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greets
>
> > I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The
> > first one is
> > setup properly but the second one never gets configured.
>
> I just went through this process myself.
>
> The word I have is that FreeBSD cannot run two NICs o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+--- On Thursday, July 31, 2003 14:13,
| Barney Wolff proclaimed:
|
| On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:07:18AM -0600, Bob wrote:
| > All you are missing is the fact FreeBSD cannot handle
| > two NICs the same subnet. OpenBSD does, NetBSD does and Linux does.
** Reply to note from "Bryce Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:59:14
-0500
> I'm trying to run freevrrpd on a server with two interfaces for redundancy.
> I want them both to act as one IP in a master/slave setup. Here's the
> errors I'm getting:
>
> Jul 31 11:07:34 ns freev
Your problem looks very strange. I didn't succeed in reproducing the same
behaviour on my personal gateway.
But I noticed that, although you use ipnat(8), nat is also enabled in your
ppp(8) configuration, this *may* explains some of your problems, such as
seeing double packets. Try to remove all "
On Thursday 31 July 2003 11:21, Oleg Polyakov wrote:
> --- Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Greets
> >
> > > I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The
> > > first one is
> > > setup properly but the second one never gets configured.
> >
> > I just went through this process mys
[this was posted under another thread, so I am reposting as a new thread to
hopefully generate some responses. thanks.]
I am no programmer, so forgive my ignorance in that respect, but why can't a
metric be used to differentiate routes to the same destination network
within the routing table?
Hi guys,
still here with my netgraph node.
Today, after a couple of nice days without a problem,
i spent the last 4 hours trying to understand why the hell,
my module crash my stable box.
DISCLAIMER: this is my first real attempt to work
in kernel land, so it's quite possibile that i did
somet
17 matches
Mail list logo
